Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 12,1997 <br />(#10 Spring Hill Golf Club - Continued) <br />Gafiron referred to item F which provides the information regarding the EAW, and in <br />particular to the letter from the DNR. <br />Jabbour said the Council is not ready to act on the EAW or EIS. <br />Gaffron said additional EAW information will be forthcoming from Marshal Braman and <br />suggested a special meeting be scheduled to review it. Jabbour agreed. <br />Gaffron reviewed the Planning Commission and Staff recommendations as outlined in the <br />5/8/97 memo and the discussion was as follows: <br />(1) Zoning Conformity - Council agreed that the pertinent portions of the site should be <br />rezoned from RR-lB-1 to RR-IB and the future use of the site as a conference center <br />would be eliminated. <br />(11) Legal Combination - Applicants' Attorney, Tom Crosby, said they agreed with the <br />legal combination but would most likely plat the property, which would make it easier for <br />granting conservation easements. Jabbour was informed that this would include the <br />proposed trails. Crosby indicated the property south of Spring Hill Road would remain <br />independent as an outlot. <br />Flint asked if depictions are available as to what the property will look like after the EAW <br />is complete. It was agreed that it is difticuit to make this determination at this time. <br />Crosby said the plans can be defined by the drawings presented and descriptions. <br />Jabbour asked if there will be a developers agreement. Gaffron said there would be and it <br />would include the platting. Crosby agreed. <br />Radio suggested the Council use the current plans as a basis for alt conditions. <br />Flint asked how this would be affected by ch^ges. Gaftfon informed him that there has <br />been no resolution presented with conditions as of yet. A resolution can be prepared <br />once preliminary or conceptual approval is given. <br />Jabbour indicated his support of the project based on the proposed plan. He indicated <br />that an EIS could be necessary if the plans were significantly changed from those <br />currently shown. He noted the need to pin down any variables and asked for this <br />information prior to the next meeting. Moorse said this information can be reflected on <br />the final revisions of the plan.