Laserfiche WebLink
Response to Hennepin County <br />Comment 1: ...The improvements on County Road 6 must be designed to meet State <br />Aid standards and plans must be reviewed and approved by the County. <br />Response: No turn lanes are proposed at this time. If the City determines that traffic safety <br />improvements related to this project are needed in the future, they will be designed to State Aid <br />standards. <br />Comment 2: ...The design of the culvert must be performed by a registered Professional <br />Engineer and must conform to State Aid standards. The plans must be reviewed by the <br />appropriate county officials. <br />Response: The County was contacted by Schoell & Madson, Inc. engineering staff to discuss <br />culvert design in January 1997. Preliminary plans, designed by a registered Professional <br />Engineer, were then forwarded to County staff for review and comment. Final plans will be <br />prepared based on County staff comments and designed by a registered Professional Engineer <br />Comment 3: Well U 161437/27 is not 178 feet as stated but 429 feet from the Minnesota <br />[Geological Sur\'ey’s( MGS) ] County Well Index, CWI. <br />Response: Additional information included in the original drillers log and stated on the CWI <br />index as the final well depth, indicate that the well was drilled to a depth of429 feet. However, <br />it was then grouted between 429 and 178, and a 8" stainless steel screen was installed in the sand <br />and gravel unit. This information was apparently left out of the CWI. A copy of the original <br />driller’s log is enclosed. <br />Comment 4: Also the County encourages the city to reduce to the extent possible the <br />developments impact on the “Big Woods” <br />Response: Efforts have been made to minimize impacts to the “Big Woods”