Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Council Action continued <br />Page 3 <br />April 23, 1997 <br />Jim Bruce Request for Clarification of Council Action Regarding Fox Hollow Subdivision _____ <br />Because Jeanne's understanding of the action differs from Mr. Bruce's understanding of both the <br />Planning Commission and Council action, and because the action does not specifically address his <br />proposal regarding the cottage, which was part of the subdivision application; Mr. Bruce has <br />requested the Council clarify whether its approval of the subdivision included the use of the cottage <br />as an accessory stnicture under the conditions described in the staff report, i.e. removal of the kitchen <br />and filing covenants against the property to prohibit as a separate dwelling unit. <br />Council Determination <br />The specific request by Mr. Bruce is for the Council to clarify whether their intent in approving the <br />subdivision was to approve the use of the cottage as an accessory structure within specific <br />parameters. If the Council's recollection of its intent regarding the cottage is clear, the Council's <br />action will be straight forward. However, if the Council has difficulty recalling thr details of its <br />action, the Council has several options: <br />1. <br />2. <br />Request clarification from the Planning Commission concerning its intent regarding <br />the subdivision approval specific to the accessory structure. <br />Take action to clarify the accessory structure issue based on the City's general <br />treatment of these types of requests at the time of the initial Council action. <br />3. Take action to clarify the accessor)' structure issue based on the Council's current <br />P' tion regarding accessory structures. <br />4. Reier V jack to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation. <br />Isv <br />ROKfOXHOLLOKJEM