My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
04-28-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 3:38:03 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:28:38 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
530
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item 17 <br />14. Comment: “Erosion and Sedimentation should offer greater detail on measures proposed <br />to manage the grading/excavation of approximately 80 acres of land by moving almost <br />340,000 cubic yards of soil material. No grading plan is provided.” <br />Response: Best Management practices to avoid and minimize erosion during construction are <br />included in the design. A seeding plan was distributed to the Cities. A complete set of site <br />construction plans was distributed to the Cities of Orono and Medina, and the Minnehaha Creek <br />Watershed District. The City of Orono supplied a complete set of plans to the DNR at their <br />request. <br />No soil will be moved off site. In addition, earthwork is balanced on each side of Co. Rd. 6, so <br />no soil moving vehicles will have to cross the road. <br />Item 32, Summary of Issues <br />Comment: “...the analysis and consideration of impacts, including examination of the <br />“alternative measures to mitigate the project ’s impact on the Big Woods remnant” should <br />not be deferred to later permitting for a resource of this significance. The possibility of <br />impact avoidance or minimization should be fully evaluated as part of the environmental <br />review process. The EAW does not include this information.” (DNR letter 4/9/97, page <br />2) <br />Response: Impacts are being reviewed concurrently for the Conditional Use Permit as well as <br />the EAW. It is important to note that the golf course is a permitted use of the Conditional Use <br />Permit. <br />Impacts to the Big Woods have been minimized in several aspects throughout the golf course <br />design. Eleven different routings were prepared and reviewed for the site. A comparison of <br />densities of golf holes on the property south of Co. Rd. 6 and north of Co. Rd. 6 shows that 1 1.80 <br />Acres per hole of land is proposed, compared to a more dense 9.07 Acres per hole in less <br />sensitive areas. The density is significantly lower in the Big Woods. <br />Fairway design is as narrow as possible in sensitive areas such as Big Woods and wetlands. <br />In addition, an area (0.64 acres) has been set aside as upland buffer area, for protection under the <br />Wetland Conservation Act. This upland area is adjacent to residential off-site Big Woods tracts. <br />This area, on the golf course property is in total, approximately 4.6 contiguous acres of Big <br />Woods. Another area where fairways were designed to minimize impacts, allows for a 2 acre <br />parcel of Big Woods. Most Big Wood tracts are connected so as not to leave “islands” of <br />isolated areas. Non-impacted wooded areas adjacent to Big Woods will also lessen the island <br />effect. <br />The clearing process on this golf course will go thru many stages. The first stage will be a <br />clearing, 30 feet either side of the center line of the golf hole. After this initial clearing is <br />completed, all of the clearing from that point on will be flagged. Any tree that is in question to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.