My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
04-28-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 3:38:03 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:28:38 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
530
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
>'v <br />H <br />4 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: April 18,1996 <br />ITEM NO.: <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Michael P. Gaffron <br />Title Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #2098 Eva Theobald, 4101 Highwood Road - Variances - ResoluUcn <br />Zoning District: LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1 acre. <br />Application: Request for lot area, lot width, 75-250' hardcover, front (street) and side setback <br />variances to replace existing re.' ^ence with a new home. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Resolution <br />B - Notice of Planning Commission Action 4/18/96 <br />C - Memo and ’.ni/nj of 4/9/96 <br />Discussion <br />Please review tne memo and exhibits of April 9th. Briefly, the applicant intends to sell her property, <br />and is working with a realtor, Stuart Hoam, to obtain variance approval for construction of a new <br />residence on the prop.*rly. A specific house design has been developed *br this limited site, which <br />requires a number of variances as follows: <br />1. Street setback (25’ proposed, 30’ required). <br />2. West side setback (9.5’ proposed, 10 ’ required). <br />3. East side setback (8' proposcd/6' cantilever, 10 ’ required). <br />4. 75-250’ hardcover (40% proposed, 29.7% e.^isting, 25% allowed), <br />5. Lot area (8,550 s.f. existing, 43,560 s.f. required). <br />6. Lot width (46’-50’ existing, 140’ required). <br />This item was originally reviewed by the Planning Commission in January, at which time it was <br />tabled for revisions. The applicant was advised to reduce proposed lot coverage to the 1,500 s.f <br />limit, eliminate the structure-to-structure setback variance to the neighboring garage, and attempt <br />to maintain 10 ’ setbacks from the side lot lines. The revised proposal was reviewed by the Planning <br />■i <br />«
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.