My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
04-28-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 3:38:03 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:28:38 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
530
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2. <br />3. <br />The property is located in the LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential <br />Zoning District, requiring 1 acre in area and 140’ of lot width. <br />The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 21, 1997 <br />and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon a finding that <br />the findings of fact in Resolution No. 3719 are still valid, and include the <br />following: <br />A.The property currently contains a small 600 s.f. house and no garage, yet <br />the property already exceeds the 25% 75-250' hardcover limit due to the <br />extremely small lot area and narrowness of the lot. <br />B.The proposed house and attached two car garage will comprise of 1,492 <br />s.f. of structural footprint on the property, meeting the 1,500 s.f <br />limitation for lot coverage on extremely small lots established in zoning <br />code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C). <br />C.The proposed house is located less than the normal 30* required setback <br />from Highwood Road in order to minimize the amount of hardcover <br />needed for driveway. The proposed 40% hardcover in the 75-250' zone <br />is not dissimilar from the hardcover percentages on other properties in <br />the neighborhood. Further, no hardcover is proposed for the 0-75' zone, <br />and overall hardcover on the property is proposed at 22.9%, within the <br />25% standard of the DNR. <br />D.The west side setback of 9.5' only occurs at a midpoint comer of the <br />proposed house, while the majority of the stmeture will meet the 10' west <br />side setback requirement. Further, the proposed construction has been <br />revised such that the setback between the proposed attached garage and <br />the detached garage on the neighboring property exceeds the 10' <br />minimum st 'ucture-to-structure setback requirement. <br />F.The proposed 8' east side setback, including a i0’x2' cantilevered segment <br />approximately 6' from the east side lot line, is necessary in order to <br />maintain a functional house width for room layout. The house in total <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.