My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1997
>
04-28-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 3:38:03 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:28:38 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
530
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON APRIL 14,1997 <br />(US Home Occupation Licenses - Continued) <br />Greg Malek, the neighbor whose property is located to the rear of the applicant's, was <br />present to voice his concerns. Goetten informed him while no action could be taken, <br />Malek could voice his concerns. Malek said he originally owned the entire piece of <br />property and sold the front property to the applicant. At that time, the Council requested <br />the driveway be located to the west. Malek requested the driveway be located to the east <br />to save a stand of trees. A letter from Malek, which is part of the record, asked for <br />Malek and Kezar to share the cost of maintenance of the driveway. Malek said a letter <br />from an engineer, also part of the record, indicates the driveway is constructed to handle <br />automobile traffic only and not made for tajcks. Malek said there are 3-5 trucks in and <br />out of the Kezar property weekly. He provided a list of license numbers of vehicles at <br />the Kezar property. Malek said the driveway is not engineered to handle delivery trucks. <br />Malek informed the Council that it is his belief that Kezar is in violation of the home <br />occupation license. He asked that if the business is to continue that the driveway location <br />be changed. Goetten informed him that no use variances are allowed by the code, and <br />the code will have to be changed to allow outside employees. <br />Goetten informed Malek that he will be notified when the application is back before the <br />Council. Van Zomeren clarified that the code would require revision to allow the <br />business to continue to operate. She indicated there is no notification process with home <br />occupation licensing. She was directed by Council to include notification of adjacent <br />property owners when considering amendm''nts. Van Zomeren said if the code is limited <br />to licensing, an acknowledgment signature would be required. Van Zomeren said she <br />would not make that recommendation for licensing. The driveway issue criteria would <br />require review. Shared driveways should not be allowed with truck traffic as noted. <br />Kelley asked what steps the City takes when a license is in violation. Van Zomeren <br />indicated Oman inspected the property; although, he did not walk through the home. <br />Kelley indicated there was nothing that can be done about the driveway issue at this <br />point. Peterson noted she was involved m the particular subdivision and recalled the <br />outlot being a requirement of the County for one access. Gappa indicated a new <br />driveway and curb cut would require approval by the City. <br />Kelley moved, Peterson secc nded, to table the home occupation license application for <br />Mitch Kezar to the April 28 Council Meeting. Staifwas directed to act regarding the <br />current violation. Vote; Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />(Mayor/Council Report after Agenda Item #12)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.