My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1997
>
04-28-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 3:38:03 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:28:38 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
530
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON APRIL 14,1997 <br />(#6 - #2212 Rebers - Continued) <br />Jabbour said he recommends maintaining the easement for the service road. <br />Peterson asked Radio if conditions can be placed on the application for elimination of <br />Hwy 12 access if the Brimhall access was approved. Radio referred her to the Planning <br />Commission condition #5 as noted on page 7 of the 4/10/97 memo indicat'mg the right-in, <br />right-out access to Hwy 12 is to be eliminated when the frontage road to the rear of <br />Outlot E (Lot 1) is developed. Radio said the conditions also put th applicant on notice <br />regarding orientation of the business. Pflam said he had no objection if the condition <br />placed future owners on notice regarding access only via a frontage road, but objected to <br />the condition being recorded due to potential marketability problems. <br />Goetten questioned what would happen if a buyer was found for Outlot F. Pflam said the <br />applicant would make another application to the City. He also indicated that a service <br />road would be used by the public and felt the cost could not be assessed to property <br />owners only. He also indicated a buyer for Outlot F may prefer a private driveway onto <br />Brown Road. Pflam asked Staff to address in a memo how the frontage road would be <br />laid out, assessed, and any conditions that would be required to be met. <br />Jabbour asked Pflam if there was any objection to the Park Dedication fee. Pflam said <br />no. <br />Gafifron asked for discussion to clarify findings for redrafting of the resolution. Radio <br />indicated a motion for conceptual approval or denial with findings could be made, with <br />formal approval of a resolution at the next meeting. <br />Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the preliminary subdivision and conversion <br />to buildable lot status as outlined in the discussion with use of Brimhall for access only <br />and directed Staff to draft said resolution. Applicant was asked to work with Staff and a <br />Council member on details. Radio inquired if a condition regarding orientation would be <br />included. Council agreed to make the condition cited in the resolution. <br />Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />Jabbour asked Staff to work with Otten regarding clospfp qf |)}§ ea$terrtmosf ^wy 12 <br />access and use of Brimhall for access. <br />(Agenda Item #7 follows Item #14)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.