My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-14-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
04-14-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 3:26:20 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:20:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
299
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 17, 1997 <br />(#2 - #2212 Sidney and Barbara Rebers - Continued) <br />Pflam asked the City to wait for development of Outlet F to occur. He noted the ideal use <br />of that property would be a single office building which is being considered. He said <br />access for such a building could come from Brown Road with a cul-de-sac to the building. <br />The easement would still exist if a future need was determined. <br />Council Member Flint questioned where the trail would be placed if the road was not built. <br />Otten did not see the need for the trail with the existing sidewalk. Flint reiterated the <br />sidewalk was a temporary solution and did not have the required trail width. Pflam was of <br />the opinion that the trail could be built by Hwy 12. <br />Stoddard asked what the City’s intention was for building the frontage road. Gaffion said <br />the Comprehensive Plan called for the road as a parallel corridor to Hwy 12 in response to <br />the increasing traffic load and to eliminate direct access onto Hwy 12. Gaffion said the <br />traffic will continue to increase forcing U-tums to occur which is not desired by the City. <br />He noted the existing problems with access on and off Hwy 12. Gaffion said it may be <br />reasonable to construct the frontage road from Willow Drive to the outlot noting there <br />will be financial and easement limitations. <br />McMillan inquired if the applicant envisioned two accesses to Outlot F from Hwy 12 and <br />Brow'n Road. Pflam said both accesses were possibilities and two separate legal accesses <br />exist, one at 2160 Wayzata Blvd. and one along Hwy 12. <br />Lindquist read a letter into the minutes from the City Engineer indicating the need for <br />roadway and utility easements. The City Engineer noted the existing plans for the east- <br />west frontage road and indicated development should be tied into the plans. <br />Rebers said he is concerned with the location of a service road near the residential lots and <br />impacts on safety. <br />Smith inquired if there was the ability to make additional changes to Hwy 12 as it exists <br />today for a front access. Gaffion said no. He indicated the lack of a defined road corridor <br />through Outlot F leaves the possibility to develop where desired and attempt to attract the <br />type of buyers that would benefit the property. Gaffion said it is Mn/DOT s intention to <br />create a right-in, right-out access for Outlot E with no changes to the medians or a service <br />road. The question is whether development of Outlot E should occur prior to the service <br />road being built. <br />McMillan questioned whether there was a possibility for a spur road aligning with <br />Brimhall Lane to Hwy 12 without a left turn lane. Gaffion said the road was widened at <br />that point which would allow the possibility of a left turn lane. McMillan was of the <br />opinion that this would be a good alternative. She would like the service road to be <br />platted in case use intensifies in the future.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.