My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-14-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
04-14-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 3:26:20 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:20:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
299
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />meeting HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 <br />(#12 - #2190 James G. Fullerton - Continued) <br />divided off but served by Fox Street on the east side. The current proposal is for a five lot <br />subdivision. It was noted that there wiU not be a back lot serving another propeny. All of <br />e ots meets the area and width requirements. There is a caretaker house which will be <br />rnaintained Application will be made for a condition use permit and wiU meet the area <br />standards but is ocated about 45' from the lake shore. The accessory structure will be <br />located on the lot lines and will not meet the standards. Mabusth stated <br />woLd be alJo^eT ^ access <br />Winston informed the Commission that Tract E has an easement to use Fox Street but <br />oes not currently use it. He also noted that the tract is not less than 2-1/2 acre lots as <br />w f«'ricts the number of <br />umts. Winston said the limitation is only to the size. Mabusth said this would allow an <br />additional unit to be served by Tract F for a total of possibly seven. <br />Mabusth informed the Commission that the entrance to the area is 25' width and <br />surrounded by retaining walls. She noted that it would be difficult to upgrade the <br />roadway. The City Engineer reviewed the access and determined that it should remain a <br />private road to a minimum width of 24'. Mabusth said it would be difficult for this to <br />occur within the 500' due to the wooded nature of the property. The fire and police <br />departments will also review the plan. <br />Winston said it was his desire to retain the gate and amenities along the entry. Lindquist <br />agreed that it was a beautiful entrance. Mabusth said the plan calls for an innovative <br />approach to an upgrade, and if the Commission supports it, it would be difficult to <br />envision a 24' width with a ditch. The Commissioners all agreed to support some <br />flexibility regarding this issue. <br />\Vinston reported that the division would result in lots of at least 4 acres in size. He noted <br />that the most northerly lot would be accessed directly from the street and several lots <br />would not utilize the entire length of the access. Only three lots would use the full extent <br />of the dnveway to include the FuUerton homestead. Tract E and Lot 1 almost <br />immediately e.xist off of the private drivew'ay. <br />Lindquist indicated that the private road would be maintained by the property owners.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.