04-14-1997 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MARCH 17, 1997 (#6 - #2214 Richard Kozicky - Continued) Smith acknowledged the proposal addresses the hardships of access and safety but the significant amount of additional structural coverage is not a result of the hardships noted. Kozicky said he had been unaware of the increase of258 s.f in hardcover and would be willing to reduce the driveway hardcover by that amount. He also noted the two entrances assist in maintaining safety. Smith said the existing residence is at 45.65 where 25% is allowed. She asked the applicant to consider reductions in the proposal to maintain the existing percentage. Lindquist inquired about the size of the proposed garage. Kozicky said the garage would be at a 24' width with a new entry way and laundiy room. The proposed garage is deeper than the existing garage. The current deck is being enlarged. Smith inquired if the applicant knew at the time of purchase that the lot was substandard and would have limitations in what improvements could be made. Kozicky said he did not. The applicant was informed of the view of the Commission regarding excess of structural and hardcover on substandard lots. Kozicky said the patio has been reduced but he would be willing to remove the remaining 34 s.f landing in front of the deck. Lindquist informed the applicant that the Commissioners would like to maintain the structural coverage at the existing percentage and eliminate any flirther intensification of structure on the small lot. Kozicky said he had been unaware of the increase until he read the Staff letter. There were no public comments. Mrs. Kozicky asked if the overhang presented a problem. The Commission felt the overhang maintained the architectural inte^ty of the home. Stoddard asked the applicant to speak with the building inspector regarding the overhang. Kozicky asked if the average lakeshore setback could be reevaluated. Van Zomeren said she would need to gather further information regarding the upper and lower deck on the neighboring property for recalculation. Lindquist said the intent of the Commission is to see the property as conforming as possible in regards to intensity of structure, average lakeshore setback, and hardcover. The applicant reiterated the Commission's recommendation to existing structural percentages. Stoddard suggested pulling the family room back behind the average lakeshore setback and reducing the size of the garage. The applicant questioned a reduction in the amount of driveway, but Stoddard noted the effect would be on hardcover and not structure. I 4