Laserfiche WebLink
TRAP NETS No. of sets: 10 Trap survey date: 07/23/1986 <br />species <br />White Sucker <br />Carp <br />Golden Shiner <br />Black Bullhead <br />Brown Bullhead <br />Yellow Bullhead <br />Yellow Perch <br />Pumpkinseed Sunfish <br />Bluegill Sunfish <br />White Crappie <br />Black Crappie <br />Hybrid Sunfish <br />FISH STOCKING DATA <br />year species <br />89 Walleye <br />90 Walleye <br />92 Walleye <br /># fish # per set total pounds pounds per set <br />0011 1.1 0017.10 1.71 <br />0006 0.6 0027.20 2.72 <br />0006 0.6 0000.30 0.03 <br />0553 55.3 0146.60 14.66 <br />0011 1.1 0002.50 0.25 <br />0007 0.7 0003.90 0.39 <br />0010 1.0 0000.80 0.08 <br />0003 0.3 0000.30 0.03 <br />0138 13.8 0016.50 1.65 <br />0012 1.2 0000.30 0.03 <br />0247 24.7 0001.65 0.17 <br />0006 0.6 0000.65 0.07 <br />size <br />FRY <br />FRY <br />FRY <br /># released <br />131000 <br />175000 <br />130000 <br />Wildlife such as beaver, muskrat, waterfowl, shorebirds, songbirds, turtles, frogs and other <br />amphibians are present on or near the Site. Whitetailed deer have been observed on the Site. <br />Wetland mitigation will increase the area of wetlands and new upland buffers present on the <br />Site prior to construction by nearly 2 acres. These wetlands will provide suitable habitat for a <br />number of wildlife species. A total of 50.88 acres of forest habitat and 25.51 acres of <br />brush/grassland will be converted to golf course on the Site. Minimal impacts are anticipated <br />to wildlife. Additional fragmentation of the forested areas will occur which will create more <br />open areas and forest fringe. No physical barriers (fences) to wildlife are proposed on the <br />interior or exterior perimeter of the property, with the exception of some potential security <br />fencing at the maintenance facility. Animals will continue to travel along wooded and open <br />areas throughout the property. <br />b Are there any state-listed endangered, threatened, or special-concern species; rare plant <br />communities; colonial waterbird nesting colonies: native prairie or other rare habitat; or other <br />sensitive ecological resources on or near the site? X Yes . No If yes, describe the resource <br />and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the resources was <br />conducted. Describe measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. <br />The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Natural Hehtage Program was <br />contacted and requested to review their records for any threatened, endangered and special <br />concern species on the Site. The DNR, in response, indicated that the EAW address the <br />issue of Big Woods (see appendix B).