My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-20-1997 Council Packet Special Meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
02-20-1997 Council Packet Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 2:55:17 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 2:55:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAY PLANT MOOTY 2-13-1997 15:52 PAGE 2/2 RightFAX <br />3. Item 2 lb - Solid Waste: Hnrnrdoiis Waste: Storage Tanks. Additional <br />int'oniiation needs to be provided with respect to the refueling area to be prov ided for golf <br />course equipment. <br />4. Item 1 2 - Physical Impact on Water Resources. The data regarding Long <br />Lake water quality needs to be updated to include the new data provided by Miiuiehaha <br />Creek Watershed District following the Long Lake Water Quality Improvement Projects <br />undertaken in 1996. <br />Tlie information regarding public accesses to Long Lake provided at the bottom of <br />page 6 are in error. Tliere arc currently two public accesses to Long Lake. I think this <br />was also the case in 1988 when the data was prepared. <br />5. Item 1 a - Water Ouahtv Surface Water Runoff. It would appear that the <br />data set forth on page 10 should take into account the water that flows into the wetland on <br />the east of Long Lake and from that wetland through the culvert on East Long Lake <br />Road. <br />6. Rig Woods Remnants Additional data should be supplied with respect to <br />the reduction of Big Woods remnants on the property and efforts which will be made to <br />limit the damage to the Big Woods remnants. <br />7. Proposed Conclusions. 1 agree with the comment of the City Attorney at <br />last Monday's Council meeting where he indicated that the City was not in a position at <br />this time to make some of the conclusions e.\presscd by the proposer: e.g., the conclusion <br />in Item 29 that "no improvements for additional infrastructure will be required oft site as <br />a result of the prc'ject” and the conclusions in Item 31 that there are no other potential <br />environmental impacts. <br />GI'JSSJII vl <br />.0.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.