Laserfiche WebLink
Potential for Historic Archeological Sites. No sites associated with important historical <br />events are known to occur within the survey area. General information on the historical <br />development of western Hennepin County suggests that the Long Lake area has a very <br />low potential for contact period sites associated with Native American villages, the fur <br />trade, military affairs, or early transportation routes. Orono Township was, however, a <br />good place for Euro-American settlement and agricultural development between ca. 1853 <br />and 1940. Historic maps and plats indicate that farmsteads and non-farm rural properties <br />were distributed throughout sections 23, 25, and 26, although the location data for <br />individual buildings and structures are somewhat vague. More intensive research in deed, <br />probate, and tax records will be needed to correlate precisely the locations and historical <br />associations of specific sites with archeological features, ruins, and standing structures <br />recorded through fieldwork. <br />Field Results <br />After the background research, the project area was examined. The area includes uplands <br />and wetland depressions (Figures 3a and 3b). Because of poor ground surface visibility, <br />shovel testing was necessary across all of the uplands. Shovel tests were excavated at <br />fifteen meter inteiA als across the near-level portions of the uplands. In and around each <br />site, shovel testing was increased to five meter intervals. The survey resulted in the <br />identification of two previously unknown archeological sites, one historic and one <br />prehistoric, and three properties that were not assigned site numbers. The following is a <br />summary of the sites and locations recorded during the field investigation. Additional <br />information concerning the two sites is available in Appendix A. <br />Archeological Site 21HE0277 <br />Site Type: Resource Procurement Site <br />Site Area: Artifacts in one 40 cm shovel test, at a depth of 0-15 centimeters. Site area <br />estimated to be the level portion of the spur, 5m x 10m (ns x ew). <br />Legal Location: NW/4, SE'/4, SE'/4 of Section 26, T118N, R23W (Figure 1) <br />Landform: Upland spur <br />Elevation: 980 ft. NGVD <br />Vegetation: Fallow field <br />« <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />] <br />Geomorphology: This site is located on a glacial till capped upland spur overlooking a <br />spring-fed wetland. This landform has been an agricultural field for a long period of <br />lime, and the upper soil horizons have been truncated. The artifacts were recovered <br />from the .Ap horizon. Below the Ap horizon is a Bt horizon. <br />Present Investigation: The productive shovel test was one of a transect dug across the <br />spur. These tests were excavated at fifteen meter inter\’als. Following the recovery' of <br />the artifacts, additional tests were excavated five meters to the west, east, and south of <br />the productive test. None of the additional excavations produced artifacts.