Laserfiche WebLink
Ill null <br />At the same tin« that the EAW is distribuJrf ID ite EQB staff, copies <br />ixinis at the official distributiOT to (Because the names ofd addresses on this bst <br />change quite frequently, this list is pubUshed separately from the ^WGuidelii^) <br />RGU must send a pess release (not a paid legal notice -that is optional) to at least o« newspaper of <br />with a copy of the EAW; the RGU may charge the person fa copying costs, however. <br />During the comment period, anyone who wishes to may review and comment on the EAW. Comments must <br />te Jninal o tlK RGU wi*h the 3(May period Tl« RGU may hold pobUc meewgs. a .B »> <br />S^^axnmeoa Comment on an EAW may addea acoumey atW <br />r~-a.i imtaas ihal Moant ftinher inwsrigadon befoe the projea is oanmenced; <br />ady son* of the agencies lha. mceive copies of d« EAW <br />on which ageicies haw jurisdiclion and expenise related to the potential sttpaos of the piojw and cn the <br />magnitude of the impacts. <br />Response to ^5 <br />of that infotmatioa <br />Trie decision on the need fa an EIS must be made in confomanoe with part 4410.1700 of the EQB’s rules. <br />The standard to be tfijAied is as follows: <br />••An EIS shall be esdered fer tsojects that haw the potential for signiflonl etwircnmenial effects.” ISubpcn 1) <br />•In deciding whette a project has the potential lot significant entrironmental effects the RGU shall contpree <br />the impotts that may reasonably be expected to occtir fiem the projea with the CTitera': <br />A. Type, extent, and reversibility of envirorunental effects; <br />B. Cumulative potential effects of related a anticipated future projects; <br />C. The extent to which environmental effects are subjea to mitigation by ongoing pubUc regulatory <br />authority; andD Uie extent to which aivironmotlal effects can be anticipaled and controlled as a reailt of other <br />' intotatot bv txiblic attenefa g the project proixieer. or of EISs prevtoody <br />prepared.'* (Subparts 6 and 7) <br />m RGU must apply the standard arxl oiterL. to the totual information oxitained in the EAW. the co^ <br />irrdved on the EAW. and responses to the comments. The infocmadoj arxi reasoning relied ^ m reacl^ <br />decision must be documented in a written recod suppoting the decision coit^