01-27-1997 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #2195 January 16, 1997 Page 2 marina. During that review. Planning Commission raised a number of concerns which resulted in tabling of the application. Those concerns include: The visual appearance of the proposed building. The proposed storage of boats displayed for sale within the lakcshore yard adjacent to the proposed building and in an area proposed as non-hardcover. The lack of adequate parking to meet the letter of the code. The lack of public restroom facilities for use by slip customers. The lack of a boat head pumpout facility. The fact that this property has never connected to the available municipal sewer. The need to upgrade stonn water facilities as part of this overall proposal. The general intensification of use of the site. Revised Proposal Applicants have submitted a revised proposal including the following: - Increasing the proposed building length from 46' to 48 ’, resulting in a proposed lakeshore setback of 47* (existing building is 20' from the shoreline, 75' required). Proposed 15* side setback meets 10' minimum. Proposed street setback of 17' where existing building is 12’ and required is 30'. Revised facades and roof lines to create a more residential looking building. “ Provision of men's and women's restrooms for use by slip customers, within the east end of the building. - Proposed enclosure for continued use of satellite portable toilets on the Tanager Lake side of the property. Provisions for sanitaiy head pumpout system and sewer connection. Proposed parking lot expansion of 3 stalls, with an alternate plan for 10 additional stalls. Detailed grading plans for stormwater ponding for both stall and 10 stall alternatives. Revised hardcover calculations. In addition, applicants have provided a detailed analysis of their proposed use of the site and their expectations for hov it will operate. Applicants have provided their position regarding parking needs for the 12 slips proposed to be used for boat display purposes. Applicants have also provided information regarding the hardcover trade-offs involved with both the 3 stall and 10 stall parking expansions as well as impacts on trees. Planning Commission is requested to review applicants' commentary as well as their application summaiy' table.