Laserfiche WebLink
IS <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 4, 1996 <br />(#10 - Review of O'Sullivan Application - Continued) <br />Flint asked that the slope of Olive be considered. McDermott said the path now goes <br />through the center of the street by CoRd 19, while the activity is geared towards the <br />intersection of CoRds 15 and 19. Several examples were given of how trails should be a <br />straight shot to an area as people will take the path of least distance to get to their <br />objective. <br />O'Sullivan said his design consultant suggested that the trail not be located until it is seen <br />how it would be used. He felt there would be an incline along Navarre Lane and felt it <br />made more sense to have a trail along Olive. He also noted, that with the retaining walls, <br />people cannot cut across. O'Sullivan said the location of the trail was displayed at the <br />public meetings, and those in attendance saw no problem with the location as designated. <br />O'Sullivan said if the trail comes on the north side with a sidewalk on his side of the <br />property, it would lead directly a'^ross the street from the municipal lot. Flint suggested <br />the trail cut diagonally behind the pond from Navarre Lane. McDermott said the trail <br />could not fit in between the retaining wall and the pond. O'Sullivan said it would also <br />have to be set on pilings. McDermott said he would prefer the trail straight along Navarre <br />Lane but contours would have to be reviewed. Gaffron noted that there would possibly be <br />a 10' high wall to the east of the buildings and elevation about 946' for the pond. The <br />elevation at the street level at Shadywood is 962'. <br />Gerhardson said the ADA requirements would also have to be reviewed to determine <br />difficulties with the grade for both options. He also noted that the Olive Avenue option is <br />across the street from a City park. Flint asked if the trail comes out of the property where <br />proposed, why that would not be a good option. It was noted that the trail would have to <br />cross two driveways to get to the intersection and across an uncontrolled intersection. It <br />was also noted that all businesses face away frcm the street. Gaffron asked the key <br />question of where was the destination of people traveling along the trail would it be the <br />park or the Navarre area. All of the Commissioners agreed that the Navarre area would <br />be the destination. With that, FUnt asked O’Sullivan to see if he could bring the trail down <br />along the middle along Navarre Lane. Flint noted that the contour of Olive is 22’ <br />upwards. Use felt that whatever is done for those people in the ru’ea should be carefully <br />considered and done well to give those people the message that the City cares about their <br />neighborhood. <br />Gaffron reviewed the purposes of the B-5 zoning as providing businesses to serve the <br />neighboring residential area. He noted that by bringing in a trail, it would be a positive <br />step and part of the whole scheme in beautifying the Navarre area. <br />Beal asked how much of a drop there would be in grade noting the fill that has already <br />been brought in by O'Sullivan. O'Sullivan said the drop was extreme at about 10'.