07-16-1984 Planning Packeta - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ave been r. Some , have a lelght of ise healthy ►ur tgular >m the it or Ln the that lill ng skies eauty of reason ers be the wetlands life that id geesey ires. We r as it this ither than i at hand, stal Bay lorating f needed id our trust that ;>arties e to state serns trued as bmitted, ’^1 ‘V>- ir A I i w ■j*' •:% :v or ■r-^rr-.- ■ Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE:July 11, 1984 SUBJECT: #783 I.D. Caples, 4798 North Shore Drive - Variance Application - Variance Lot Area Required ■ 1 acre or 43,560 sf Existing = .35 acre or 15,360 sf ♦"with 15* of right of way" = .41 acre or ^®»285 sf ♦"with 30* of right of way" « .495 acre or 21,585 sf Variance — .65 acre or 65% With 15* Variance * .59 acre or 59% With 30* Variance * .505 acre or 50% ♦Based on partial vacation of Maple Avenue B) Lot Width Required Existing Variance 140* 75* 65* or 46% LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Revised survey by staff May 11 letters to Campbell + Turney July 3 letters to Cambell + Turney Planning Commission minutes of April 16,1984 Review of Application #783 At your April 16, 1984 meeting. Planning Commission advised Caples that the City would approve of the partial vacation of Park Avenue. The vacation would enable applicant to acquire additional lots on north side of Park Avenue for combination with subject property. I have enclosed copies of letters to the two property owners advising them of Caples intent. Turney and Campbell as joint owners of Lots 15, 16, 17, and 18 plan to develop the property as one building site. They l)3ve not had the area confirmed by a surveyor but it is their guess that they have .8 acres or 80%. They have advised Caples that based on the 80% standard for sewered properties, they would have no interest in selling off one of the lots. The second exchange of letters asked for the 15* of right of way that would revert back to Lots 15, 16, 17 and 18 upon vacation of Park Avenue. Paul Campbell called me from Washington to seek confirmation of the area of the four lots and I advised that only a surveyor could do this. He understood Caples dilema but based on the approximate guess on area, he would not be willing to release the 3,000 sf of additional area. If a survev is made confirming the area of Lots 15, 16, 17, and 18,^hey 4 ti 4 O •? r I- Revi€ with the appl- varii If nc mone: Find Plar wit! of V