Laserfiche WebLink
iD <br />IVdmini str ator <br />- plentywood PRD <br />ted along with <br />it PRD application <br />I a septic <br />iround (dry build- <br />)f at the boundaries. <br />hrough PRD-9 as per <br />test results: <br />Is the 100' set- <br />ick does create <br />:es. In this case <br />linfield sites. <br />>und. The proposed <br />Ltes. I suggest <br />»ction measures <br />snd of this report) <br />I and approved for <br />alternate sites. <br />0 place drainfield <br />1 aware of locations <br />illow trenches, <br />jrely limit the <br />could the setbacks <br />) place house, but need <br />>achment . <br />ntion must be given <br />ncroachments. <br />Septib Testing July 10, 1984 <br />Page 2 - Craig Winters <br />I have requested that the site evaluator submit additional design and <br />layout data for all the mound systems. The following guidelines are <br />suggested for this PRD project: <br />Once the mound layouts are known, a specific "drainfield envelope” <br />should be designated on each PRD lot. In most cases, the tested and <br />approved sites will not be capable of being relocated due to site/soil/ <br />water/topographic conditions!!! <br />Where 100* setbacks would force houses to encroach on designated drain <br />field sites, the setbacks must be relaxed. (Important on Lot 1 and <br />Lot 7) <br />Will house setbacks be specifically designated in the resolution? <br />(To avoid the type of confusion we had on Lafayette Ridge) <br />A number of sites are located very near the proposed roadway. Developer <br />must fence off the designated drainfield sites so that construction of <br />the roadway does not disturb them especially on Lots 2, 7, 8 & 9.