Laserfiche WebLink
TO:Planning Commission <br />FROM:Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator <br />DATE:June 15r 1984 <br />SUBJECT: #838 Thomas Bernierr etal» Maple Avenue - Vacation <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit F <br />Exhibit G <br />Exhibit H <br />Exhibit I <br />Application & Petition <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owner's List <br />Survey <br />Staff Sketch <br />Alan Olson Letter 7-28-80 <br />Resolution #762 <br />Resolution #843 <br />Old Survey of Ivy Lane travelled roadway <br />The applicants are owners of property abutting portions of Maple <br />Avenue on Casco Point. Maple Avenue is platted as a 60' right-of-way <br />but exists only as a gravel driveway serving two houses. The City has <br />sewer and water Ines on or adjacent to the right-of-way. <br />The abutting property owners are listed on Exhibit E for clarification <br />purposes. Please refer to the petition (attachments to Exhibit A) <br />describing the request for vacation. <br />The Public Works Coordinator has expressed the following concerns: <br />1. Will require 20' width utility easements over sewer and water <br />lines. <br />2. Planning Commission should address the private storm drain that <br />collects runoff near Casco Circle and discharges onto the Barr <br />property. <br />3. The City would be prudent in acquiring additional right-of-way <br />along the narrow strip of Ivy Lane. Doubling the current width of 14' <br />has been suggested# or based on the survey Exhibit I# perhaps a strip <br />following the existing travelled roadway would be more logical. A <br />portion of Maple Avenue at the northeast tip should not be vacated as it <br />appears to be travelled roadway. <br />Because Barr's three lots are not combined for tax purposes, Barr could <br />conceivably sell off Lot 162 and it would be land-locked by the proposed <br />vacation. A lot combination would avoid this. <br />Tract V, owned by the State Land Department as a result of tax <br />forfeiture, and Lots 184 and part of 185, owned by Douglas Klint, have <br />been dealt with by the City under applications in 1977 and 1980. <br />#838 B <br />Page 2 <br />are co <br />consid <br />in 198( <br />more t <br />indica <br />presen <br />know tl <br />light <br />increa <br />allowi <br />varian <br />A reco <br />discus <br />2. Th <br />proper <br />be des