Laserfiche WebLink
V-.. • ■••• ' <br />ministrator <br />deck. <br />work on his <br />lling within <br />lor which the <br />No further <br />installed to <br />rface runoff <br />ins, and all <br />i manner. In <br />area and 12** <br />tas indicated <br />than existed <br />Lan as being <br />he Building <br />) you concur? <br />1 goundcover <br />er this same <br />stback zone, <br />«ras asked by <br />nine how much <br />sting house <br />ir in the 75- <br />See Exhibit <br />he Building <br />k made at the <br />r the lagoon <br />the lot area <br />it has been <br />s included by <br />ta is 50,700 <br />#836 Ogle <br />Page 2 <br />This lot is severely limited by lakeshore on two sides, as well as <br />containing some preexisting hardcover in the form of access roads to <br />adjacent properties. The applicant was careful to comply with <br />required setbacks for the principal structure, but it is now obvious <br />that there is excessive hardcover on the lot. The applicant has <br />proposed certain measures he feels will serve the intent of our <br />hardcover ordinance, to allow slow infiltration of runoff into the <br />soil rather than swift runoff directly to the lake. <br />Note that the proposed driveways as shown on your site plan were <br />reviewed with the building permit and are not necessarily a part of this <br />application. After his original review of hardcover, the Building <br />Official noted that some portions of the driveway area should be cut <br />down to 10* maximum widths to keep under the hardcover limit, based on <br />his original hardcover calculations. <br />At this point, I cannot give a blanket recommendation to approve the <br />Conditional Use Permit for the proposed landscaping because of the <br />extensive hardcover. I would ask you to consider what course of <br />action should be followed. Options may include: <br />1. Require applicant to file an after-the-fact hardcover variance <br />application. This could be reviewed concurrently with the <br />conditional use permit. Perhaps some compromise could be reached. <br />2. Require applicant to remove portions of the existing building and <br />comply strictly with hardcover requirements. This would likely <br />result in litigation. <br />3. Consider this application in relation to the other houses in the <br />neighborhood, many of which are in even less compliance than this one. <br />Cit <br />Oro <br />I a <br />nei <br />Thi <br />shot <br />if <br />and <br />I ai <br />yo-u <br />Thai <br />EWR;