My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-16-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
11-16-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:32:28 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:25:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#2439 Service 800, Inc. <br />November 12,1998 <br />Page 3 <br />Summar}’ of Issues for Discussion <br />I. Variances Required <br />1. Lot coverage: <br />2. <br />J. <br />15% allowed, 26.1 Vo proposed <br />Number of parking stalls: 45 required, 36 proposed <br />("proof of parking" acceptance requested) <br />Parking lot setbacks: <br />a) Front yard: 20'required, 10’-45'proposed <br />b) Rear yard (if this reviewed as a through lot): 20' required, 3'-16' proposed <br />4. Lack of loading berth. <br />II. Engineering Issues (Also see Exhibit E) <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />Applicant must submit plans for access to Highway 12 to MnDOT for review and approval. <br />Access is proposed to be through the triangular portion of MnDOT right-of-way just west <br />of the property and directly across from Brimhall Avenue. <br />Parking lot grades should be reduced to 4% from 5%+ proposed. Additional topography <br />outside the site is needed to confirm that the grading plan will function in relation to adjacent <br />properties. <br />Retaining wall may be needed along east lot boundaiy, as well as a construction easement <br />since the storm sewer and parking lot are so close to the side lot line. A detailed plan/cross <br />section for how this boundaiy will be accomodated would be helpful. <br />The City Engineer has a number of specific questions and design comments regarding sils <br />drainage and storm sewer design (See E.xhibit E, item 3). Storm sewer calculations, and a <br />drainage area map are needed. Stormwater plan needs to be submitted to MCWD for review <br />and approval. Confirmation that the NURP pond on Outlot F, Sugar Woods, has the capacitv' <br />to serv e this site and received MC\MD approval, has yet to be submitted. <br />Plans and specs for proposed building sewer/water connections are required. <br />An expanded utility easement will be needed over the existing City water line along the west
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.