My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-16-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
11-16-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:32:28 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:25:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JULY 21,1997 <br />(#11- #2261 Tony Eiden Company - Continued) <br />Tony Eiden had no comments to add. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Hawn asked if the applicant was satisfied with the setback requirements. Eiden said he was and <br />would be able to meet them. <br />Smith moved, McMillan seconded, to approve Application #2261. Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />(Item #12 follows item #16) <br />(#13) #2264 JANET C. KIERNAN <br />1491 SHORELINE DRIVE <br />VARIANCES <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:54-9:20 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Gaffron reported that an application had been previously reviewed and approved for <br />reconstruction and additions to the residence in 1996. He reviewed that application and the new <br />changes requested. The applicant had determined that it would be impossible to save the existing <br />superstructure and is proposing a new residence. A one-stall addition to the garage would meet <br />the setback. There would be an additional encroachment to the front setback and a new small <br />encroachment to the side. The issue is with new construction being an opportunity where all the <br />setbacks, especially the lakeshore setback, could be met. Lot area and width variances are also <br />required. The one acre property-, 187' in width, is located in the tw-o acre zoning with a 200' <br />width standard. Gaffron indicated that the property may be sewered in the future but continues at <br />this time to require use of a septic system. <br />Kieman noted the hardships on the property with the maple tree to the north side and the Indian <br />mounds to the rear where a 50' setback is required. Kieman said to renovate the property would <br />require an additional two to three courses of block to create more headroom and a better <br />foundation. <br />During public comments, John Ericson, 1620 Shadywood Road, clarified that the encroachment <br />of the 75' setback would be allowed with a major remodeling but would be required to be met if
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.