10-19-1998 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 16,1996 G-i (« - #2169^hael Renard - Continued) Lindcjuist aske*^ what the hardcover facts were. Mabusth asked for a hrwkdovvn of the hardcover calcuWions and whether it included the landscaping. Be^z^hovved the survey to Mabusth, who'tiid not have a copy of this particular survey. I^^ussion was had on the particulars of the h^cover. It was determined that if the 130 jrL. of landscape rock in the 0-75' was removed, aibng with 420 s.f in the 75-250’ setback there would be no need for iance. Schroeder said 1a hardcover variance. Stdiroeder said he was concerned vvHn trading of plastic and rock as it should not have been there in the first place. The pla^ was installed by a previous owner. Schroeder said theYardcover should be separ^d showing what does and does not count. Mabusth said it v)ould not be required i£4nere was no hardcover variance required in the 75-250' setbaclc'and would only inj/olve the average lakeshore setback. Schroeder questioned whether tWs was actuallydoiown. Mabusth clarihed that the hardcover total was originally 61^2 s.f. or 26/v% where 5707 s.f. is allowed. With the removal of the 420 s.f of landscap^ock and plastic, the square footage of hardcover would be at 24.9% and not require aVari^ce. Smith asked why the shed was an issue ^n 1991. Mabusth said it was because the hardcover exceeded the allowed at jZo.7'}^^ With the shed removal, the hardcover w'ould be at 25.5%. There were no public comment. Schroeder said he was reluctant to allow the shed since the Council in 1991 recommended its removal with the sar^basic numbers presents. Lindquist noted that the structure was proposed larger at thayiime. Mabusth said there was also more hardcover and the updated survey was not available. Mabusth said thSj^removal of plastic and rock would result in a 1.8% reaction from 26.7% to 24.9%. Lindquist move^ Hawn seconded, to recommend apprwal of Application #2169 with the understanding >mat all plastic on the property would be reKwved along with the cement pad located Wthe 0-75' setback. The application would omy involve a variance to the average lak^hore setback, and the shed would be allowed toSj^emain. Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0. (#4) #2159 JAMES AND JOANN JUNDT, 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD - VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:30-7:54 P.M. The Applicant was present. Gaffron reported that the application w'as tabled at the request of the applic^t at the August 19 meet’mg of the Planning Commission. He noted that the application has been revised by the withdrawal of the boathouse from the application.