Laserfiche WebLink
n <br />(#5 - #2204 Fullerton - Continued) <br />Jabbour moved, Kelley <br />Vote- Aves3 Nays 1. Goetten Goetten’s vote was made for reasons stated She <br />Ipportrf .he'appr.ca.ion but recommends the Park Dedicat.on fee be resolved poor to <br />any approval of the application. <br />Wmston felt the case should be reviewed ad hoc. case by case. Radio indicated while the <br />- .rtainty. He also noted that the Executive Session is only being held because <br />threat of litigation from this application. <br />(M) #2212 SIDNEY & BARBARA ''oLUiroN^TOPRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION .APPROVAL - RESOLUTION NO. 3880 <br />The applicant was present along with attorney, Steve Pflam <br />Gaffron reported that the application is for pr^minaty' <br />Outlot E Suoar Woods, to buildable status. The outlet was created from a parcel ofland <br />remaining from the Sugar Woods plat for otoa <br />Outlots E and F, which is the Orono Shopping Center. At the time of the <br />comprehensive plan amendment included a frontage road to seM Projected “mmeru^ <br />development. The Sugar Woods plat conformed to that amendment with the creahon of <br />Outlot D This outlot only provides a corridor from the west boundary o ug^ o <br />to the northwest comer of Outlot F. The intent was that at some future time when oudot <br />F is developed, the remaining frontage road segment eastward to Brorvn <br />defined and^platted. Outlot D was platted because the C«y "«ded <br />traverse thenar property located between Outlots E and F. ^ of Eas^^Wdlow <br />Woods was platted, providing a corridor connecting from Outlot E of Sugar W oods. <br />westward to Willow Drive for future frontage road.