10-19-1998 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

NUNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MARCH 17, 1997 (#2 - #2212 Sidney and Barbara Rebers - Continued) Pflam asked the City to wait for development of Outlot F to occur. He noted the ideal use of that property would be a single office building which is being considered. He said access for such a building could come from BroNvm Road v-ith a cul-de-sac to the building. The easement would still e.xist if a future need was determined. CouncU Member Flint questioned where the trail would be placed if the road was not built. Otten did not see the need for the trail with the existing sidewalk. Flmt reiterated the sidewalk was a temporar>' solution and did not have the required traU width. Pflam was of the opinion that the trail could be buUt by Hwy 12. Stoddard asked what the City’s intention was for building the frontage road. Gaffron said the Comprehensive Plan called for the road as a parallel corridor to Hwy 12 m response to the increasing traffic load and to eliminate direct access onto Hwy 12. Gaffron said ffie traffic will continue to increase forcing U-tums to occur which is not desired by the City. He noted the existing problems with access on and off Hwy 12. Gaffron said it may be reasonable to construct the frontage road from Willow Drive to the outlot noting there will be financial and easement limitations. McMillan inquired if the applicant envisioned two accesses to Outlot F from Hv^ 12 and Brown Road. Pflam said both accesses were possibilities and two separate legal accesses exist, one at 2160 Wayzata Blvd. and one along Hwy 12. Lindquist read a letter into the minutes from the City Engineer indicating the need for roadway and utility easements. The City Engineer noted the existing plans for the east- west frontage road and indicated development should be tied into the plans. Rebers said he is concerned with the location of a service road near the residential lots and impacts on safety. Sn ath inquired if there was the ability to make additional changes to Hvtq-12 as >< today for a front access. Gaffron said no. He indicated the lack of a defined toad comdor through Outlot F leaves the possibUity to develop where desired type of buyers that would benefit the property. Gaffron said it is Nln/DOT s mtention wate a right-in. right-out access for Outlot E with no changes to the medians or a service road. TheVestio^s whether development of Outlot E should occur prior to the service road being built. McMillan questioned whether there was a possibility for a spur road ali^ng with Brimhall Lane to Hv,y 12 without a left turn lane. Gaffron said the road was weened a that point which would allow the possibility of a left turn lane. McMillan was of the opmion that this would be a good alternative. She would like the service road to be platted in case use intensifies in the future.