Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br />TO; <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator <br />October 15, 1998 <br />SUBJECT: #2413 Paul and Megan Bennett <br />500 Hanlon Avenue <br />Variances—Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: RR-1B <br />Lot Area:6,473.5 <br />One Famiiy Rural Residential District (2 Acre) <br />square feet (. 15 acre) <br />Last month the Planning Commission tabled this application to the applicant to consider <br />purchasing an adjacent lot before placing an addition to the residence. Fhe applicants have proposed <br />to add a 20' by 24 ’ garage with second floor living space to the existing residence. The home was <br />constructed in 1949 without a garage. The applicants purchased the home in 1996 with the <br />assumption they would be able to construct a garage. <br />This application had required the following variances: <br />1. Side yard adjacent to street setback requirements. 1T is proposed to Dickenson Street where <br />50’ is required. <br />2. Side yard setback requirements. 8.9’ is proposed where 30 ’ is required. <br />3. Rear yard setback requirements. 11.9’ is proposed where 50' is required. <br />4. Structural coverage to allow'2,011.67 s.f. (31%) where 1565.27 s.f. (24%) exists and 1,500 <br />s.f. is allow ed. <br />In 1991 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2982 to permit the construction of a deck within <br />required side yard, street yard, and back yard setbacks and to allow 22% lot coverage by structures <br />with the condition that the applicant is advised that future proposals to increase lot coverage by <br />structure on this property will not be looked upon favorably by the Council. <br />In 1996 the previous property' owners expressed interest in purchasing the vacant lot across the allay <br />from 500 Hanlon Avenue for the possibility of constructing a garage in the future. The vacant lot <br />was owned in common with the applicant ’s lot, but went tax forfeit a number of years ago, and is <br />only for sale to adjacent property owners. <br />When sewer was brought into the area the assessment was split equally between the applicant's