My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-21-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
09-21-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:28:11 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:21:46 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNEVG CONEVOSSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 15,1997 <br />(#1 - #2286 Steve White - Continued) <br />Gaf&on requested the applicant show the 929.4 contour on the .survey. Parcel A includes a bam and <br />out buildings that will have to be removed. Gaf&on recommended the removals occur within six <br />months of the subdivision approval. Septic system testing has taken place. The existing house <br />meets all setback requirements. <br />Gaf&on reviewed the issues for discussion as noted in the packet. <br />The applicant had no further comments to add at this time. <br />Lindquist asked White if he was willing to move the lot line to accommodate parcel A having at least <br />5 acres of dry buildable. White said he would as it was his intent to have equal sized parcels. He <br />informed Smith that this was the primary reason for how the property was being split. <br />There were no public comments. <br />White informed Lindquist that he understood and accepted the Staff recommendations 1-8 as noted <br />in the packet. <br />Smith was told that it was White's intention to construct a home on the second parcel wdth no further <br />subdivision. <br />McMillan questioned the amount of roadway. Gaf&on said Staff is recommending 66* instead of <br />80' as needed according to the Comprehensive Plan as no County trail is planned. He noted the <br />County's standards are different than those in Orono's Comprehensive Plan. <br />Schroeder moved, Smith seconded, to approve Application #2286 with Recommendations #1-8 as <br />listed on pages 3 and 4 of the Staff memo. Vote: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />(Agenda item #2 follows Action Item #5.) <br />(#5) #2279 AND #2280 MARC AND TRACY WHITEHEAD, 1220 LYMAN AVENUE, <br />SUBDIVISION - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:13-8:00 P.M. <br />The Applicant was represented by Attorney, John Winston, and Surveyor, Walter Gregory. Mr. <br />Whitehead arrived during the application discussion.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.