My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-21-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
09-21-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:28:11 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:21:46 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
August 18, 1998 Ke\in and Pat Kennefick <br />3241 Casco Circle <br />Wa>T3ta, MN 55369 <br />Cit>- of Orono <br />Planning Commission/ <br />City Council <br />Dear Sir or Madam: <br />Background <br />My wife and I are seeking variances to complete a large renovation project already well underway. Our <br />property at 3241 Casco Circle includes a 105-year-old home that was in need of major upgrading. The <br />majority' of the work was reconstruction on the inside of the home. We stayed within the original <br />footprint to ensure we would remain inside any hardcover restrictions relative to the home itself. Our <br />contractor applied for all required permits and the work has progressed to near completion. <br />The outside of the home also required substantial change. The front of the home was landscaped with a <br />series of terraced walls made from now deteriorating railroad ties. These timbers contained creosote and <br />included sheets of plastic between the terraces to prevent weed growth. The back of the home included <br />the same type of timbers as well as a cement wall that was crumbling and leaning severely towards the <br />house. <br />We had not intended to replace the deck on the lakeside of the house at this time, but found it necessary as <br />the construction progressed. We were removing stucco siding from the house. A portion of the stucco <br />was behind the ledger board that supported the deck. We tried to temporarily remove the ledger board; <br />unfortimately, we found it rotten and unsafe to support the deck. At that point, we made the decision to <br />replace the deck in basically the same configuration it was before. <br />We also made the decision to landscape a hill that leads to the lake in a way that would provide natural <br />beauty and comply with we believed to be the restriction regarding hardcover in the 0-75 foot range. The <br />hill to the lake caused a significant safety hazard when attempting to mow the grass. It was also <br />deteriorating with large washout gullies forming when there was heavy rain. I was unable to hire anyone <br />to mow it because of steepness and the inability of the equipment to stay on the hill. I had to wear golf <br />shoes to stay on the hill and on more than one occasion had the lawnmower roll over on top of me. <br />Fortunately. 1 made it through last summer without being injured. (A prior owner told me he had to tie <br />himself to . tree to prevent falling down the hill). Something needed to be done. <br />LCJ).• ,7 V^ Cl <br />v.»1j.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.