My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-20-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
07-20-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:23:12 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:14:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
389
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The existing residence is partially located in the required bluff setback area and the <br />average lakeshore setback area. The existing amount of hardcover is slightly less <br />than 1% of the maximum amount allowed. Very few, if any, changes can be made <br />to this residence without requiring a variance. If the structure were removed, a lot <br />area, lot width and bluff setback variance would most likely be required. (^See building <br />pad exhibit). <br />ISSU£S <br />1. The subject property does not meet the lot area, lot width or bluff setback requirements. <br />2. The existing residence is located ahead of the average lakeshore setback. <br />3. The residence was built before 1956 and has a 905 sq. ft. footprint. <br />4.The topography of the subject lot rises 25 ft. from the shoreline to the lakeside of <br />the residence. A ravine is located along the east side of the property. The garage <br />is located at a higher elevation than the house. <br />5.The adjacent residence to the west does not meet the side yard setback. It is located <br />2.5' from the property line. The applicant has indicated that he does not want <br />to build into the side yard because it would further reduce the distance between <br />the principal structures. <br />6. <br />7. <br />The adjacent property also has a garage that is located 1.5 ft. from the property line. <br />The proximity of this garage to the property line and its relationship to the street <br />blocks sight lines for exiting from the subject property. Therefore, the driveway <br />turnout should remain to allow the residents to have better visibility in backing out of <br />the garage and entering onto the street. <br />The proposed alternate design does not further encroach on the bluff setback and <br />does not interfere with views. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />To discuss the alternate plan and review the requested variances. <br />Attachments <br />A Application <br />B Location Map <br />K368 Kirk Outsort <br />710 North Arm DrNo <br />July 20. 1998 <br />pagers
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.