Laserfiche WebLink
••• .* .*•- . ;-.i .I-'.^/^'.'V«»'. i • • <br />i^av< ■ r«*« ©orxy;.oxplainc^ —■— .-— <br />Buch dif^aroACo.than che>xlBtin9 Daseaaav <br />» ** vV ‘. ' ■ »■ " ■ • . ■ *' <br />facaa, the Dov«io?er for . V irry*o,V proaontad <br />ahovlca tho esiotin? raoidGacc , ^ ‘%rago ana tno oa^c <br />a'aVbricf daacription of what ha #aa ^opoaing to <br />Plaaaing Coanioaloaer HaaaoB ? not bolleva tbo <br />fit veil vitb'tha site. <br />.* • <br />•- \ <br />%fM»- SR <br />believe there should be a need for varlancas. <br />Tiiore- varerao cossaeats fron tha public ragarding this natter <br />aad the public hearing waa closed. <br />It vas moved by Planning Coanissionar Cohen# <br />Planning Commlsslonor Moos, to table this item. <br />sons direction for tho applicants. Tho <br />not want to soa any hardcover or cutting and filling on tha nortn <br />side in the 0-75*. Within tha 0-75* sons on <br />attached garage must bo offset by removal of tha /Vsl <br />Mr. Sorry oxpraased his desire to ri^o^lt <br />detached garage had to be removed. Within the <br />was tho concensus of the Planning adhere to <br />than 30t hardcover. They also wanted tha -wieanta <br />tho average lakashora setback. <br />that coff.?liance with tha Planning «°*^^®®Kr?le? <br />cause a oubstantlal reduction in tho sis# AA‘«/house <br />suggested that a footprint be drawn prior to <br />plan. The applicant questioned the Planning <br />Jegarding the valk-oul: Kelley stated that they 7“ ^ cradlnl in <br />a valk-out to be cut on the north side if It ^us?------- The natural contours of the property mustthe 0-75' sone.V.1IO V— #.s --------------remain. Motion, Ayes-7, Nays-0, Motion passed. <br />/r! <br />*r- .