My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-20-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
07-20-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:23:12 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:14:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
389
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of OltOlNO <br />‘ {hif: '• •'•RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUI^t'lL <br />NO. ■ 2831 _______a^Si; 0r il, 'i>J} <br />for grading in the 0-75' zone is necessary to allow <br />applicant to fill in the excavation that will remain <br />after the existing house is removed/ with a blending in <br />of the grade to existing contours. The applicants have <br />revised the house plans so that their walkout concept <br />can be developed without the need to change grades from <br />those naturally occuring in the northerly 0-75' zone. <br />In the southerly 0-75' zone, minor grade changes to <br />reconstruct the driveway are necessary to provide a <br />safe and low-hardcover access to the property. <br />5. The Planning Commission reviewed application #1544 oh <br />June 18/ 1990 and on a vote of 6-0 recommended approval/ <br />finding no changes proposed from the approval granted in <br />Resolution #2587 adopted March 13/ 1989. <br />6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on <br />this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally <br />to other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br />variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions/ <br />light/ air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br />neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the applicants/ but is necessary to <br />alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br />necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the <br />applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the <br />City. • <br />7. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use <br />permit for the proposed grading in the 0-75' lakeshore <br />setback zone will not be detrimental to the health/ safaty <br />or general welfare of the public/ would not adversely affect <br />light/ air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br />neighboring properties/ nor will it depreciate surrounding <br />property values and that the proposed level of use of the <br />property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives <br />of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.