My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-20-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
07-20-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:23:12 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:14:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
389
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 15, 1998 <br />(//3 - #2370 Gary O'Keefe - Continued) <br />City Staff is recommending submittal of a revised grading plan, limiting the hardcover to 6765 <br />square feet overall, no walkout, and evaluating whether grading of the hill is appropriate in the 0-75' <br />zones. <br />O’Keefe stated he is willing to reduce hardcover by eliminating a portion of the driveway. <br />Chair Smith commented she had hoped the hardcover discrepancy could have been resolved prior <br />to tonight's meeting. O'Keefe stated that he calculated the hardco\ er at 8.66.5 square feet based on his <br />own measurements. Gaffron noted that the staff did not calculate the current hardcover but relied <br />upon an c.xisting survey. Gaffron commented he would prefer ha\ ing the O'Keefe’s sur\e>or calculate <br />the amount of hardcover currently e.xisting rather than have City Staff re\iew the property. Gaffron <br />indicated a bigger issue for the Planning Commission to decide upon is w hat is the appropriate <br />hardcover for this properU’. <br />O'Keefe inquired why there arc differences in hardcover requirements between Wa> zata and <br />Orono when they share the same lake. McMillan indicated Orono's ordinances governing hardcover <br />arc more restrictive. <br />O'Keefe also indicated vciy little grading will be done in the area where the residence is presently <br />situated. <br />It was the concensu- of the Planning Commission that a rev ised grading plan needs to be submitted in <br />order to allow them to make a determination on a variance and conditional use pennit. <br />O'Keefe indicated he would be able to supply a revised grading plan b\ Tliursday. <br />In response to a question by Chair Smith whether Mr. O’Keefe would be willing to reduce hardcover <br />in the 75-250' zones, O'Keefe stated he would be in fa\ or of reducing hardcover, noting that the <br />Planning Commission had recommended hardcoxcr be limited to 40% at its last meeting, which he <br />has attempted to comply with. O'Keefe's architect has designed the residence with special pavers <br />which would allow water to pass through. <br />Commissioners agreed that grading to blend in with the neighbor's property was acceptable with <br />an approved grading plan. <br />Chair Smith inquired whether anyone from the public willed to comment on this application. <br />Diann Goetten, City Council Representative, inquired why 40% hardco\cr was being recommended <br />for this property. <br />Gaffron reported that 40% in the 75-250' zone was suggested as a figure that could be obtainable for <br />this parcel of land. Since the Applicant is now proposing to raze the e.xisting structure, the property <br />would be considered as a new buildablc 'ot, and <br />the standard hardcover requirements would be in effect. <br />There was no further public comment. <br />Hawn stated she would like hardcover to be reduced from 40%. noting that no vote was t,akcn on
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.