My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-20-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
07-20-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:23:12 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:14:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
389
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
vf <br />f i <br />. < <br />I *' * <br />STAl iiMENT OF HARDSHIP <br />1 he applicant has indicated that the garage is 165' from the house and the topography is sleep. The <br />applicant has also stated that the deck needs replacement. <br />Criteria for Determining Undue Hardship <br />1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the oflicial conlrois. <br />2. <br />4. <br />The house and garage can continue to be used as they are currently situated. The deck can <br />continue to be maintained. Complete replacement of the deck would require hardcover <br />and side yard adjacent to street setbacks. <br />The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created <br />by the landowner. <br />The subject lot does not meet lot width or lot area requirements. The topography of the <br />lot is steep from the area where the garage is located down to the house. The setback <br />requirements are greater because of the side yard being adjacent to Bluff Street which is <br />platted but is not open for vehicular traffic. The existing garage is located within the <br />required rear yard. <br />3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />The variance to allow the garage will move it from the street and would improve the <br />setback situation from the street. Allowing Bluff Street to be used as access for the <br />driveway is a policy issue. There are many of these platted streets that are "fire lane.s" <br />down to the lake that are owned by the City but unusedfor vehicular traffic. If the <br />City were to allow access from Bluff Street it would be a departure from past practices. <br />The special conditioiv. applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar <br />to such property oi i.nimcdiately adjoining property. <br />The lots in this area do not meet the minimum lot width or lot area requirements. This <br />property is further restricted by the sideyi. rd adjacent to street setback. The topography <br />of this lot creates a difficult situation for siting a garage. The narrow width of the lot <br />also creates a problem for calculating hardcover. <br />a239.‘> Brent Bentrott <br />1453 Park Drive <br />July 20. 1998 <br />page- V
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.