07-20-1998 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'» ••, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CTrY COUNCIL. MEETING HELD ON JULY 14,1997 (#5 - #2248 David and Jodi Rahn - Continued) Kell^ asked for clarification on the hardcover calculations of an incre^e fi’ora 9% to 19% in the 0-75* setback. He was informed that the calculations do not include a drivev.ay or potential garage. There is currently no hardcover in the 75-250’ setback and the hardcover noted is the house footprint only. KeUey said a driveway and garage inevitable and would need to know the calculations for them and what amount would be added in the 0-75’ where h leads to the home. Jabbour noted that the application is ^ cnfitled to 25% in the 75-250' setback. Kelley questioned what percentage would be m the flood plain. Rahn s^d the garage would not be below the 931.5' elevation and no variance would be required for a garage. Van Zomeren agreed that no vanance would be required. Kelley said he has never turned do^/n an application for a two-car garage no.ing the necessity for garages in this area but felt the calculations should be included. He questioned a sidewalk leading to the residence. Peterson questioned the need for the calculation since it is not included in the proposal. Rahn indicated that he is allowed 1500 s.f of structure outside the 0-75* and as much as 2200 s.f with the size of the lot. Jabbour asked the applicant how he plans on walking to the hou^. The applicant ^ questioned whether a walkway is required. Rahn said he has no intention of putting in a sidewalk. Jabbour indicated that one would eventually be needed. R^ said he uses the grass area now and the decldng and entry are included in the calculations. He current^ parks on the clearing on top of the hillside and there is no established driveway. ’Goetten questioned why the residence cannot be pulled back. Rahn said the residence ^ would then be located in the flood plain. He said he has space for 1900 s.f in the 75-250' - setback. Kelley asked Staff if 25% hardcover allowed for the 75-250* setbwk includes land in the flood plain. He was informed by Gaffiron and Vm Zomeren tiiat it did. Jabbour noted the structure could be a slab on grade without a foundation. Jabbour said he would make his approval contingent on no additional variances allowed in the future and ary further improvements adhering to standards in the zoning code. Gaffion questioned with hardcover shown in the 0-75', whether this amount should be subtracted fi’om that allowed elsewhere. He felt it should be. Jabbour cited an e^^ple where tins has been done in the past. Gaffiron indicated that with 2000 s.f total it would leave 1000 s.f for any future improvemems. Jabbour said that was a good idea. Rahn agreed to comply with this request L