Laserfiche WebLink
John C. DeMoss <br />May 3,1998 <br />Page 2 <br />«• <br />whether Portland Place was considered as vacated at that time. In a letter on file from Mr. Moe <br />dated November 15,1971 he indicates he granted the City a sewer easement over 'Parcel 260', i.e. <br />a portion of theproperty w’est of Portland Place City files appear to contain no easement documents <br />that would confirm or deny whether an easement was granted for the sewer in Portland Place; at this <br />date I must assume there is no easement of record, and ask that such an easement be granted to the <br />City, per the conditions of Resolution No. 3950. <br />As of this writing the City Council has not been advised of the possible discrepancy regarding <br />whether Portland Place has actually been vacated. The lot line rearrangement review by the Planning <br />Commis.iion and Council last fall was, of course, based on the assumption that Portland Place had <br />been vacated at some past date, and this was also apparently assumed by their surveyor. The City <br />at this point has no intent to open Portland Place to vehicular travel, but certainly has an interest in <br />it related to maintenance of the existing utility lines. <br />A formal application for the vacation of Portland Place would likely be in order if your search <br />similarly comes up empty-handed. <br />In regards to Item 4(d), satisfaction of conditions of Resolution #3950: <br />Resolution No. 3950 (vacation approval. Doc. #6792311) cc'^tains the following conditions: <br />1. Legal combination per the approved survey (confirmed with Hennepin County). <br />2. Quit-claim of "Parcel C" as shown on said survey (Doc. #6792313). <br />3. Granting of drainage easement over drainageways (Doc. *f6792314). <br />4. Granting of easement for sanitary sewer lines within parcels A, G, B, D and/or F <br />(easement signed but not filed pending City creation of legal description). <br />Granting of easements for any other subsequently identified existing utilities <br />(pending).9*^ <br />In regards to Item 4(e), satisfaction of conditions of Resolution #3963: <br />Resolution No. 3963 (variance approval, Doc. # 6792312) contains the following conditions: <br />1. Hardcover not to exceed 37.5% (would require applicants surveyor to confirm <br />when house is cor. pleted; building permit was issued for a plan that meets <br />the condition) <br />2. Applicant to provide grading plan (OK; appro''ed at time building permit issued) <br />3. Building permit applied fur by 8/25/98 (done) <br />4. No action required <br />5. No action required