My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
06-15-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:20:25 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:14:00 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Long Lake Economic Development <br />should the District serve as the hiding spot for the entire Lake District? <br />• Parking. As expansion space is at a premium, and growth occurs, parking is <br />displaced. This may be a future problem in the district as sites are used more <br />intensively. <br />• Stormwater runoff management. Solutions on a parcel by parcel basis may be <br />inefficient or impossible. <br />• Access to new Hwy 12. This was not an issue with any of the District people we <br />talked with. <br />• Preserve small town, City as the campus feeling. Everyone seemed to like being <br />in Long Lake and the cooperative feeling that is generally the rule in the District. <br />• Employees seem to find the District. No special problems unique to the District In <br />attracting or holding employees were noted. <br />WHY ARE WE DOING THIS? <br />The City can make choices and pursue strategies that will reduce uncertainty about <br />investments in the District and confirm Its future. <br />One of the choices the City could make about the future of the District could be called <br />the “Fairy Godmother Option". The City could contract with a developer who would <br />v/ave their magic wand and create a new district of big box retail spaces (very feasible) <br />or big box industrial, office and warehouse spaces (maybe not so feasible). <br />Or, it could confirm a diverse future for the District and renounce use of its powers and <br />financial tools to encourage a fundamental change in the character of the District. <br />If the City chooses the former, its role is simple. With the developer it prepares a plan <br />and goes forward. If the City chooses the latter, its role becomes more complex. <br />The City could continue its role as a mediator. Shining its light Into different corners of <br />the District to mediate problems (any of the Issues noted) on a case by case basis in <br />response to some crisis. <br />Or. the City could create and provide c ^et of rules or a strategy on how and when it will <br />intervene in the District to assist peopU ^vesting the District This set of rules could <br />cover when and how public improvements will be made. • It could be rules for financial <br />Intervention. When and by what standards it will use its short term revolving loan fund, <br />utility abatements, tax abatements, revenue bonds, land cost write downs, assessment <br />assistance, start up grants, and tax increment financing, both up front bonding and pay <br />as you go. It could be changes to the Zoning Code encouraging or discouraging th(i <br />expansion of retail uses throughout or in some parts of the District, or it could result in
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.