My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
06-15-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:20:25 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:14:00 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
\ <br />City of Long Lake Economic Development Am <br />industrial users is reduced in three ways: cost, availability, and image. <br />The cost of vacant (non productive) land, even with the costs of providing <br />services to it. is simply less than the costs of assembling a parcel of developed <br />(productive) land. Land costs are inevitably lower elsewhere. <br />Vacant land is immediately available for construction. Assembling a parcel in a <br />built district is both time consuming and uncertain. Relocation schedules of <br />affected business complicate the process further. Remediation of the some parts <br />of the site may be required. Promising a “move in" date to the client is a much <br />more confident commitment when starting with a vacant site. <br />A new large industrial user would almost by definition have an image unlike its <br />neighbors, the present businesses in the District. At a vacant site in a developing <br />district the neighbors would probably be very similar in character to the large <br />user. The edges of your parcel would be secure, and performance standards for <br />ensuring the image of the development would be enforced by covenants or by <br />the city. <br />Last, because we are not on the limited access highway network, and because <br />we have no large vacant parcels, and because our business and spaces typically <br />do not use industrial brokers for transactions, brokers and developers simply <br />never visit. We seem to be caught in a trap that prevents us from appearing on <br />the mental maps of the development community. <br />Our market was described as a “resident based niche market". A new user <br />owner or the potential tenants of a new speculative development are expected to <br />come from an owner who is a resident of our area who wants to locate their <br />business close to their home. And, unlike many places in the metro area, this is a <br />potentially strong market for our District. <br />To capture this new market of large industrial businesses not now located in the <br />District, we need to provide confidence to potential investors in two areas. First, <br />that they will be able assemble a site of adequate size. They will not be held up <br />by a single unreasonable or unv/illing seller. Second, the district will be stable <br />and eventually compatible to their investment at their edges. They or the <br />developer will have control over what their neighbors look like and what they do. <br />This means development will be described in terms of subdistricts rather than <br />parcels, and may involve vesting development rights in a "sole source" <br />accountable and responsible for development of parts of the district over time. <br />This also means direct City participation in redevelopment of the District. To <br />capture these new large industrial users and use their Investments to transform <br />the District the City must be prepared to assist its private partners by:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.