06-15-1998 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

#2361 - Yaeger June 11,1998 Page 5 Issues for Discussion 1 . Should Lot 64 be designated as an individual Record Lot separate from Lots 65-8-9-10-11? 2. If so, should the after-the-fact variances be granted to allow the new cabin and gazebo to remain in their non-conforming locations? Options for Consideration ISSUE 1 - Record Lot Status A. Recommend denial of the lot area and width variance, concluding that Record Lot # 15 must consist of all 6 separate tax parcels. [Implications: Lot 64 remains unbuildable, and it follows that the cabin and gazebo constructed without permits must be removed] QR B. Recommend approval of the lot area and width variance, concluding that Record Lot #15 should be separated into two individual record lots (#1 5A and #1 5B). [Implications: Lot 64 gains Record Lot status and the variances for cabin and gazebo constn. Mon ran be reviewed on their own merits] QR C. Recommend approval of a lot width and area variance conditioned on applicant acquiring some specified additional adjacent (or non-adjacent?) land for combination (or special lot combination?) with Lot 64. [Implications: Lot 64 remains unbuildable unless/until additional land is added to it; cabin and gazebo variances remain in limbo for a limited time until applicant can acquire additional land] QR D. Other, or some combination of the above. ISSUE? - Cabin and Gazebo Variances A. Recommend that the new cabin and gazebo be relocated to meet 75' lakeshore setback and 10' side setbacks, which would eliminate the hardcover variance; and that the cabin be provided with a continuous enclosed approved foundation to frost level. QR B. Recommend that the new cabin and gazebo be allowed to remain in place, that lake setback, side setback and 0-75' hardcover variances be granted (specifically define the hardships that support such a position) but require that the cabin be provided with continuous enclosed approved foundation to frost level. QR