Laserfiche WebLink
#2361 -Yaeger <br />June 11, 1998 <br />Page 3 <br />Potential Combination of Adjacent or Non-Adjacent Record Lots <br />Applicants' attorney and a neighboring property owner have contacted staff regarding the possibility <br />of combining adjacent or non-adjacent properties with applicants' lot, to result in no net increase of <br />Record Lots on the island. <br />One suggestion was that applicant acquire Lot 65, leaving Lots 8-9-10-11 as a separate Record Lot <br />which would not abut the lake. This may be reasonable, and would be more attractive if 8-9-10-11 <br />could be combined with another adjacent Record Lot that abuts the shoreline, but this appears <br />unlikely so far. <br />A second suggestion w'as that applicant acquire or gain certain buildability rights from some <br />undeveloped Record Lots located some 600' to the northwest. These two record lots (#63 & #69) <br />are individually unbuildable but would become buildable under Section 10.31 Subd. 6H if legally <br />combined, because they would total more than 0.5 acre. The RS District standards do not provide <br />for such a 'transfer of development rights' as was contemplated by the proponents. This would have <br />to be the subject of a zoning amendment in staffs opinion; but it has some merit in that it would <br />ultimately further the City's goal of maintaining low density on Big Island. <br />In reviewing the 1982-83 documentation surrounding Ahern's dispute of the record lot designations, <br />it appears that the City did not close the door on the idea of redesignating the Record Lot-status of <br />individual lots or groups of lots, especially if the end results are no net increase in the number of <br />building sites, and building sites that have septic capabilities. <br />Recent Construction <br />In July 1997 staff found a new cabin nearing completion on Yaeger's Lot 64 (see letter of July 31, <br />1997). A stop work order was posted and a violation citation subsequently issued for work without <br />a building permit. The new cabin clearly was in violation of lakeshore setback and hardcover <br />regulations. Tlie cabin also is missing a full perimeter foundation which is required under the RS <br />ordinance. A gazebo of apparent recent construction w-as also noted on the site. (See photos) <br />The new cabin replaces a pre-existing cabin of approximately the same dimensions and location <br />which previously existed at the site, and which was apparently removed shortly before the new <br />construction began (debris from the former cabin was noted to the rear of the new cabin - see <br />photos).