Laserfiche WebLink
File #2340 <br />March 13, 1998 <br />Page 6 <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />\V ill Planning Commission recommend approval of a variance to allow the driveway outlot <br />to serve three total dwellings?f/2o0:^£^l--^ <br />Does Planning Commission have any other coiKems regarding access to tlvis property or to <br />adjacent properties? <br />Since the proposal for a duplex on Lot 2 appears to meet all the Conditional Use Permit <br />standards listed in the code, does Planning Commission have any additional concerns or wish <br />to place additional limitations on the use of Lot 2 for a duplex? <br />7. <br />8. <br />9. <br />Does Planning Commission find any justification to grant special approval for lake access <br />for the proposed duplex units? ^ ^ <br />Will Planning Commission recommend approval of a CUP for land alterations to create a <br />berm within 5' of the lot line as part of this subdivision proposal? ^ ^ ^ yiMvST' <br />Does Planning Commission con 'ur with staff that crediting unused 75-250' hardcover toward <br />the 250’-500' zone meets uie i;?tent of the hardcover ordinance \vithout the need for a ^ <br />variance? <br />,uP 1^TO /X/C Cci/‘^5lAO«3 <br />Staff Recommendation <br />II. OF <br />(.D' <br />Planning Commission should address each of the 9 issues noted above in any recommendation. If <br />the conclusion is that the subdivision should be recommended for approval with certain variances <br />and conditions of approval, staff would recommmend the following additional conditions:: <br />1. <br />2. <br />City Engineer to review preliminar>' grading and drainage plan prior to Council review. <br />Applicant shall construct a 24' paved width road within Outlot A and grant easements to all <br />property owners who will make use of that road. <br />3. <br />4. <br />Applicant shall be responsible for making whatever changes are necessary to the grades <br />adjacent to North Shore Drive to improve sight distance. <br />The duplex lot shall not have riparian access, and the City shall require the filing of <br />covenants in the chain of title of Lot 2, to document that Lot 2 shall have no access to the <br />lake. <br />5. Subject to the standard park dedication fee.