My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-18-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
05-18-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:22:48 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:12:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
459
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Robert D. Erickson <br />847 Tonkawa Road <br />Orono, MN 55356 <br />May 18,1998 <br />Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members, <br />Thank you for the opportunity to express my concerns regarding the request for variances at 365 <br />Westlake Street. Last year 1 purchased the property across the street at 372 Westlake Street 1 was <br />aware, at the time of purchase, that the Westlake Street area was zoned LR-1 A, which specifies a <br />two acre minimum lot size, and that a former owner of my property, Loren Bruggeman, was <br />denied in his application for two one acre lots in 1996. For the last several months, I have been <br />working on a new plan for this property with the goal of not requiring any variances. My wife and <br />1 have recently leased the home at the address above. Our plan was to live on Tonkawa until our <br />new home on Westlake Street was complete. <br />With this background, 1 was more than a little surprised to learn a few days ago that staff would <br />consider approval of a new house on this sueet on a .22 acre lot, resulting in a density four times <br />that which was denied Bruggeman. <br />In reference to the staff report dated May 14, I can find no mention under " Pertinent Standards " <br />of the requirement for a 50 foot Front Street Setback (East) requirement per LR-1 A standards, <br />nor any existing or proposed dimensions for either the Principal Structure or the Accessory <br />Structure regarding the setback from Westlake Street For neighboring property owners, this <br />setback is probably the most critical in terms of the visual impact <br />Ihe stated hardship," constraints of lot size," did not deter the applicant from buying the property <br />in 1991, and was probably reflected in the purchase price. Only now that they want a bigger house <br />docs the lot size become a" constraint." <br />'Ihc applicant has not met the criteria for undue hardship for the following reasons: <br />1. The property ggn be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by official <br />controls.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.