My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-18-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
05-18-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:22:48 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:12:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
459
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
#2340 - Robert & Iris Waade <br />May 15,1998 <br />Page 4 <br />Lot 2 meets the 135' minimum width for a duplex (shoreland ordinance <br />requirements) if measured along the east frontage of Lot 2 abutting Outlot A. {The <br />Zoning Code identifies the shortest side of a corner lot such as this, as the 'front'. <br />However, in this case the side abutting Outlot A will function as the front lot line and <br />if the line abutting Outlot A is formally defined as the front lot line by City action, <br />the lot could be considered as conforming in width for a duplex lot. The intrusion <br />of the MiVCC lift station into the site suggests that this would be an appropriate <br />conclusion, given the impacts that intrusion has on the building envelope for this <br />site). <br />The duplex proposed for Lot 2 meets the 15' required depth of the side yard adjacent <br />to the back lot access outlot (Outlot B). <br />The 10' side and 30' rear yards are correctly shown on the drawings assuming the east <br />lot line is defined as front. <br />Section 10.03, Subd. 27 (C) (4) states that no more than two residences may be <br />ser\’ed via an access outlot (Outlot B) but applicant's plan has three units being <br />served by Outlot B. The solution is to design a duplex with a separate access <br />driveway coming off the road outlot, Outlot A. As dra\\m, this requires a variance. <br />Hardcover for Lot 2 is now shown as 8% in the 75-250' zone where 25% would be <br />allow'ed, and 36% in the 250-500' zone where 30% would be allowed. However, the <br />250-500' zone should be credited with unused hardcover allowance from the 75-250' <br />zone, because an unused hardcover allowance can be transferred to a zone further <br />from the lake while still meeting the intent of the code. This is demonstrated below: <br />Area of 75-250' zone in Lot 2 = 12,915 sf 25%=3,229 sf <br />Proposed hardcover in 75-250' zones = 1,030 sf <br />Excess available allowance = 3,229 sf - 1,030 sf = 2,149 sf (Credit to 250-500^zone) <br />Total area of 250-500' zone in Lot 2 = 8,865 sf 30% = 2,660 sf <br />Add credit from 75-250’ zone: 2,660 sf + 2,149 sf = 4,809 sf <br />Proposed 250-500' hardcover = 3,170 sf, which is less than 4,809 sf, hence the proposal <br />should be considered as meeting the intent of the hardcover ordinance. <br />Lot coverage bv structures was noted to be excessive (22%) during the March 16 <br />review. Applicant has reduced this to 3200 721,780= 14.7%, meeting the 15% limit.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.