Laserfiche WebLink
#2340 - Robert & Iris Waade <br />May 15,1998 <br />Page 2 <br />March 16 Meeting Recap <br />At the March 16 Planning Commission meeting, the following occurred: <br />A neighborhood group submitted a petition opposing the duplex use <br />Planning Commission noted that the lot coverage for the duplex lot is at 22% but <br />cannot exceed 15%. Applicant noted he could reduce it to meet 15% {the latest <br />preliminary plat dra^ving reduces the building to 3200 s.f. or 14.7% the 0.5 acre lot) <br />Planning Commission agreed to the concept of allowing the storm pond to be credited <br />toward the extra 50% acreage requirement for the back lot, which is proposed at 0.79 <br />acres in the most recent plan. <br />Planning Commission agreed that the proposal meets the intent of the hardcover <br />ordinance with no variance needed <br />Planning Commission expressed support for the site variances necessary to develop <br />two single family homes, but not necessarily those for a single home plus a duplex <br />New issues identified for applicant to address included proximity of road to <br />neighboring homes; impacts on neighborhood drainage; and lack of time for review <br />by City Engineer. <br />On March 16 applicant requested tabling rather than a recommendation of denial. <br />On April 20 at applicant's request the application was tabled without discussion since <br />no new information was available at that time. <br />Analysis of PRD Option - Benefits, Issues <br />The benefits of and issues raised by the possible development of this property as a PRD are <br />discussed in the April 17 memo. Applicant does not wish to pursue a PRD at this time.