My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-18-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
05-18-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:22:48 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:12:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
459
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
V <br />To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator <br />May 11,1998 <br />Subject: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment - MUSA Boundaiy’ <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Notice of Public Hearing <br />B - Informal Letter of Request to Met Council Staff 4-7-98 <br />C - Map: Existing MUSA <br />D - Proposed MUSA Additions <br />Discussion <br />The City Council has directed that staff proceed to make an application to Met Council for expansion <br />of the MUSA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area) to include areas northeast of Maxwell Bay. The <br />attached letter to Tom Caswell at Met Council provides details as to the City's motivation to expand <br />the MUSA, in order that sewer might be provided to serve existing and proposed developments <br />within the Shoreland District. Exhibits C and D show the existing MUSA boundary and the areas <br />proposed to be included. <br />The intent of the letter to M’* Caswell was to get a sense of whether Met Council staff might <br />recommend approval of such an amendment, and what related or unrelated conditions they might <br />attach to it. The verbal response we have received is that because this is intended to allow sewering <br />of lakeshore areas, they will support the request. However, Met Council views Orono's 2-acre and <br />5-acre zoning as inefficient use of land that ultimately results in premature extension of the metro <br />sewer system (because efficient high-density development will leap-frog past Orono to the next tier <br />of developing areas and be more difficult and expensive to serve). For this reason, and for all the <br />other reasons that high-density residential housing is being promoted by Met Couiicil (affordability, <br />life-cycle options, etc.) Met Council staff has suggested we should identify how we are <br />accomodating other types of higher density housing types in other areas of the City. Staff will <br />identify all areas where this type of development is possible in Orono. However, the lack of services <br />and high costs of land tend to make the creation of new affordable housing difficult in Orono. <br />Process <br />The public hearing is the first step in tlic process for completing a Comprehensive Plan amendment <br />to revise the MUSA. Once Planning Commission has completed the Public Hearing ^d <br />recommended approval, a Resolution will be presented to the City Council for conditional adoption <br />of the amendment subject to Met Council approval. The proposed amendment will be submitted to <br />the Met Council on their standard forms widi supporting information, and also submitted to adjacent <br />municipalities for comment. Once Met Council has approved the amendment, the City can formally
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.