My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-18-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
05-18-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:22:48 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:12:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
459
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OP THE PLACING COMMISSION WEl^TING FEBRUARY 20, 1990 T ' 2- <br />ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.M. . w v <br />The Orono Planning^GDnunissi9n met on the above date with the <br />following members pres^tr/ Chairman Kelley; Planning <br />Commissioners Cohen# Hanson)s<^el lows and Brown. The following <br />represented the City staf£/^BuiIding 6 Zoning Administrator <br />Mabusth, Assistant Planning & Zoi^ing Administrator Gaffron <br />City Recorder Scheff ler. ycouncil ^presentative Goetten attended <br />and Counoilmember Calla^n was also present. , . ..r,Z, COu:^ <br />#1490 K-P PROPERTIES t ' <br />340/350 NORTH ARM LANE . <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT OT <br />PUBLIC HEARING 7:04 P.M. - 7:30 P.M. , <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Mr. Don Peterson and his partner was present for this Public <br />Hearing. <br />Mr. Peterson said that he had a purchase agreement for Lot 1 <br />contingent upon there being a satisfactory solution the <br />septic system. He said that this is a one-time opportunity to <br />develop both lots to the full potential. He requested that the <br />lot line rearrangement be approved without the additional 17' of <br />right-of-way being dedicated. He said there was already 33 <br />granted by the property owner to the north in 1925. No further <br />right-of-way was reserved and he understands that the City would <br />like to have 50’ of right-of-way. Mr. Peterson said that he <br />would have no objection to the additional right-of-way, but it <br />will interfere with the septic system. Peterson said he had <br />talked with the property owners on the west side of North Arm <br />Lane regarding subdivision of their property. They could <br />dedicate 17' of right-of-way when they subdivide, but they are <br />not interested in subdividing at this time. <br />Chairman Kelley asked how far down North Arm Drive City <br />sewer extends. <br />Mabusth indicated the location on the map. <br />Planning Commissioner Cohen asked how wide North Arm Lane <br />is? <br />Mabusth replied that it is 33' wide and the City is <br />maintaining the roadway. <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson asked how a determination is <br />made in regard to which roads the City ma:..itains.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.