Laserfiche WebLink
File #2340 <br />March 13, 1998 <br />Page 3 <br />Hardcover for Lot 1 is proposed at just under the 25% limit in the 75-250 ’ zone and <br />at 25% in the small portion in the 250-500' zone; but the narrow driveway proposal <br />still has a minimal apron at the garage which may be difficult to maneuver, <br />suggesting that at final site planning a more flexible layout may be desired. <br />Lot 2 is technically a "front lot" and in this case is proposed for construction of a duplex, i.e. a single <br />building with two dwelling units, on a single lot. Under Orono's ordinances this duplex lot could <br />not be split to have two separate owners. The result is that at least one of the units will be a rental, <br />and/or possibly both will be rental. Regarding lot standards: <br />Lot 2 meets the 0.5 acre minimum lot size required for a non-riparian duplex lot, the <br />same standard applicable for a single family lot. <br />Lot 2 meets the 135' minimum width for a duplex (shoreland ordinance <br />requirements) if measured along the east frontage of Lot 2 abutting Outlet A. {The <br />Zoning Code identifies the shortest side of a corner lot such as this, as the front'. <br />However, in this case the side abutting Outlot A will function as the front lot line and <br />if the line abutting Outlot A is formally defined as the front lot line by City action, <br />the lot could he considered as conforming in width for a duplex lot. The intrusion <br />of the MJVCC lift .station into the site suggests that this would be an appropriate <br />conclusion, given the impacts that intrusion has on the building envelope for this <br />site). <br />The duplex proposed for Lot 2 meets the 15' required depth of the side yard adjacent <br />to the back lot access outlot (Outlot B). <br />The 1 O' side and 30' rear yards are correctly shown on the drawings assuming the east <br />lot line is defined as front. <br />Section 10.03, Subd. 27 (C) (4) states that no more than two residences may be <br />served via an access outlot (Outlot B) but applicant's plan has three units being <br />served by Outlot B. The solution is to design a duplex with a separate access <br />driveway coming off the road outlot, Outlot A. As drawn, this requires a variance. <br />Hardcover for Lot 2 is now shown as 14% in the 75-250' zone where 25% would be <br />allowed, and 45% in the 250-500' zone w'here 30% would be allowed. However, the <br />250-500' zone should be credited with unused hardcover allowance from the 75-250' <br />zone, because an unused hardcover allowance can be transferred to a zone further <br />from the lake while still meeting the intent of the code. This is demonstrated below: