My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-20-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
04-20-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:14:18 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:06:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 16, 1998 <br />(#10) #2348 Mary Jane Hauser - Continued) <br />Smith and Berg both felt the code should be applied to the application and the 25% <br />hardcover be met. Malkerson reiterated that the driveway would need to cut through the <br />treed area to meet this requirement. Malkerson did not believe the lot should be <br />considered a "clean" lot, such as is found in a cornfield Bera said the requirement aoDlies <br />to all lots. Malkerson suggested the grading and filling be considered as well. Berg noted <br />that the issue is whether the lot can be built uoon within the oarameters aiven. Malkerson <br />disagreed that the test of the lot was as indicated by Berg. <br />Stoddard noted he did not believe there was a hardship based on the lot. Stoddard said he <br />may consider a plan with a small variance but the Commission historically does not send to <br />Council applications that are not substantiated with a proposed plan. Stoddard said he <br />could not support the plan as submitted. <br />Hauser asked to table the application for further review. Smith explained the procedure <br />that is following. <br />Bressler asked for direction for the applicant regarding the amount of hardcover. Hauser <br />asked if the Commission would approve hardcover at 25.9%. Bressler noted that tabling <br />the application would require an extension from the 60-day review period. <br />GafFron was asked for his opinion. Gaft'ron indicated that he would not be able to <br />simulate a nercentase. He indicated in most cases the hardcover allowed sets the limit. <br />Circumstances may present some alteration but is difficult with no hardship shown for a <br />bare lot. GaflDron said Council may look at the existing amenities. <br />Bressler noted that 320 s.f would equal 1% of hardcover. <br />Berg asked if the applicant would consider eliminating the loop while still maintaining the <br />entrance and driveway. Hauser said he would consider that noting the hardcover would <br />still be exceeded by about 500 s.f Discussion was held regarding placement of the garage <br />but Hauser said the locations were such to take advantage of the existing grades. Hauser <br />said the driveway could come straight in as an option as previously noted. Berg informed <br />Hauser that the Commission's intent is to create a good situation for both the city and <br />applicant. <br />Smith questioned whether there was adequate support of the 25.9% hardcover requested. <br />This would result in elimination of the loop without moving the driveway.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.