Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON M.ARCH 16, 1998 <br />(#10) #2348 Mary Jane Hauser - Continued) <br />Hauser said his intent is to utilize the lot in the best manner. Hauser said the neighboring <br />homes exceed the allowable hardcover. Hauser felt he was not asking for anything special <br />noting he could meet the hardcover allowance by placing the driveway in the treed area <br />but reiterated the problems it would cause in that location. <br />Hauser said the design has gone through much review. His time line is problematic, and <br />he would like the Commission to make their recommendation at the meetine in order for <br />him to move forward with his financing <br />Mabusth indicated that hardcover was the only issue and noted that the house was ideally <br />located on the lot. <br />Hauser asked the Commission to consider the additional burdens existing on the property. <br />Berg suggested that an option was to eliminate the circular driveway. <br />Mabusth asked if consideration has been given to removing a portion of the loop. Dressier <br />said eliminating the loop driveway would reduce the hardcover within 1% of meeting the <br />25% allowed but had been informed by the applicant that this was not an option he would <br />consider. Dressier said staff then looked at the footprint for possible reductions in <br />hardcover. The plan for a straight driveway through the treed area would result in <br />hardcover of 27%. A drivewav alternate was noted on oaaes 10 and 11 of booklet <br />presented by Malkerson, which eliminates the loop of the driveway reducing the driveway <br />by 1000 s.f at a 12’ width. Hauser indicated this would place the driveway into the higher <br />elevations. It would result in difficulty in backing out and require retaining walls and 2000 <br />cubic yards of fill. <br />Smith inquired about the proposed separate structure on the property. The structure is a <br />proposed 2-car earaae in addition to the 3-car attached earaee. The oricinal plan was for <br />a 4-car attached garage but was eliminated due to hardcover. <br />In noting the applicant's strong feelings regarding each element of the application and not <br />wanting to redesign the plan any further, Stoddard asked what could be done to reduce <br />the hardcover Hauser said he has tried to do so and considers the straight driveway as a <br />last resort. He feels the property conditions with the grades and fill constitute hardship to <br />allow the hardcover variance for use of the existing driveway. <br />Dressier proposed a change to the garage structure location and size to meet the <br />hardcover. The separate structure would be increased in size and the attached garage <br />reduced in size. It was noted that this increase would result in the structure becoming an <br />oversized accessory structure.