Laserfiche WebLink
]». ^ •• • • <br />‘ .1 <br />ZOIV/iMGjV^ <br />MARCH 1998 <br />AMERICAN <br />PLANNING <br />ASSOCIATION <br />% - <br />1# <br />I > <br />"Nobody Told Me They <br />Changed the Zoning!" <br />B\ Fay Dolnick <br />s communities grow, zoning ordinances should remain <br />mT^ flexible enough to meet changing land-use needs. As <br />stated in the Standard State Enabling Act of 1926, “provision <br />must be made for changing the regulations as conditions change <br />or new conditions arise, otherwise zoning would be a ‘strait- <br />jacket’ and a detriment to a community instead of an asset.” <br />Neighborhood rezoning and other land-use changes can have a <br />significant, even adverse, impact on the lives and properties of area <br />residents. To lessen the probability of such impacts, public hearings <br />on proposed zoning changes arc normally required by state statute. <br />ik NOTICE OF PROPOSED <br />SH^HiNb land use action <br />Shoreline, Washington, uses bold lettering to catch the attention of <br />passersby and explicit details for those who take a closer look at a <br />proposed Lvid-use action. <br />The purpose of these hearings is to obtain additional information <br />regarding the proposed change for the decision makers and to <br />enable citizens to express concern or ask questions. <br />The most effective hearings happen when residents arc <br />informed well in advance of the hearing ’s date, time, and <br />location. The identification of the affected propern* and the <br />proposed land-use change are important and relevant facts to <br />report to the public. <br />This issue oiZoning News discusses the various methods <br />communities can employ to communicate news of an <br />impending zoning change to the public and examines a varieev* <br />of procedures used in ordinances. <br />Overview <br />The Standard State Enabling Act recommends a 15-day advance <br />notice of a public hearing through a general circulation <br />newspaper, but also notes that this can var>' to suit local needs. <br />he most effective hearings <br />happen when residents are <br />informed well in advance of the <br />hearing's date, time, and <br />location. The identification of the <br />affected property and the <br />proposed land-use change are <br />important and relevant facts to <br />report to the public. <br />Although state statutes typically require public hearing notices, <br />they leave the details to the municipal ordinance. <br />Municipalities invariably use one or more of the following <br />methods to notify ihe public of a proposed land use change: <br />■ advertisements in a general circulation newspaper; <br />■ mailings to propern* owners most likely affected by the change; <br />■ posting a sign on the property site with the proposed change. <br />Charles Reed, editor and publisher of The Zoning Report, has <br />pointed out that based on the number of people who appear <br />and testify at hearings, newspaper notices arc the least effective <br />method of notification. <br />The time allowed for notification of a forthcoming hearing <br />can range from seven to 30 days before the hearing takes place. <br />However, most notifications occur 10 to 15 days before the <br />hearing. The specified radius of an affected propert)', about <br />which a properc)' owner must be notified, ranges from 100 feet <br />to 700 feet, with a median of 300 feet. <br />Mailings of a notification arc usually sent via post using <br />either first class or certified mail. Administrative costs associated <br />with mailing lists and postage arc assumed cither by the <br />municipalit)* or by the applicant for the rezoning. <br />When the number of persons to be notified becomes <br />excessive, communities employ more practical and cost-effective <br />methods of public notification. For example, Santa Cruz. <br />California, opts for a newspaper advertisement rather than a <br />mass mailing when notification numbers exceed 1,000. <br />Regulations for the onsite sign can range from a simple <br />instruction that it be placed prominently on the affected site to <br />ver>' detailed requirements on the size, lettering st)*lc, textual <br />information, and placement of the sign in relation to the street <br />and the adjoining properties. Some ordinances provide detailed <br />drawings of sign requirements. <br />Although the municipal planning and de\*eIopment department <br />may provide the sign, the applicant usually bears the rcsponsibilit)* <br />and costs for placing it. Some municipalities ask the applicant to <br />supply a signed affidavit suting that the sign has been posted and <br />that it conforms to the municipal standards. <br />f*.*